This map shows the geographic impact of Norbert Hanik's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Norbert Hanik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Norbert Hanik more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Norbert Hanik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Norbert Hanik. The network helps show where Norbert Hanik may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Norbert Hanik
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Norbert Hanik.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Norbert Hanik based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Norbert Hanik. Norbert Hanik is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Khanna, Ginni, Talha Rahman, E. De Man, et al.. (2016). Comparison of single carrier 200G 4QAM, 8QAM and 16QAM in a WDM field trial demonstration over 612 km SSMF. TU/e Research Portal. 674–676.6 indexed citations
8.
Fehenberger, Tobias, Tobias A. Eriksson, Alex Alvarado, et al.. (2016). Improved achievable information rates by optimized four-dimensional demappers in optical transmission experiments. Journal of Lightwave Technology. 1–1.1 indexed citations
9.
Fehenberger, Tobias, Mikael Mazur, Tobias A. Eriksson, Magnus Karlsson, & Norbert Hanik. (2016). Experimental Analysis of Correlations in the Nonlinear Phase Noise in Optical Fiber Systems. Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology). 488–490.6 indexed citations
10.
Fehenberger, Tobias, Domaniç Lavery, Robert Maher, et al.. (2015). Demonstration of Sensitivity Gains by Probabilistic Shaping for Optical Communication Systems.. arXiv (Cornell University).2 indexed citations
Alfiad, M. S., Frédérique Machi, M. Kuschnerov, et al.. (2010). Feasibility study for 111 Gb/s Polmux-quadrature duobinary with a SE of 4.2 b/s/Hz. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 448–449.1 indexed citations
Breyer, F., et al.. (2009). Real-Time Gigabit Ethernet Transmission over LED-based Plastic Optical Fiber Systems. mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich). 95.1 indexed citations
Goebel, Bernhard & Norbert Hanik. (2008). Analytical Calculation of the Number of Four-Wave-Mixing Products in Optical Multichannel Communication Systems. mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich).2 indexed citations
18.
Breyer, F., Norbert Hanik, Sebastian Randel, & Bernhard Spinnler. (2006). Investigations on Electronic Equalization for Step-Index Polymer Optical Fiber Systems.2 indexed citations
19.
Düser, M., Jaime Spencer, Ignacio de Miguel, et al.. (2003). Investigation of future optical metro ring networks based on 100-Gigabit Metro Ethernet (100 GbME). UCL Discovery (University College London).3 indexed citations
20.
Breuer, D., et al.. (2002). WDM-Transmission Over Mixed Fiber Infrastructures. European Conference on Optical Communication. 3. 1–2.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.