Noboru Katayama

1.0k citations
51 papers · 790 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Noboru Katayama

50 papers receiving 763 citations

Peers

Noboru Katayama
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Insect Science 356
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 477
  • Genetics 322
  • Plant Science 339
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 62
Replace T. L. Wilkinson with:
T. L. Wilkinson United Kingdom
Juan A. Torres United States
Dênis Coelho de Oliveira Brazil
Shelley E. Hoover Canada
Kevin J. Carpenter Canada
Michael J. Grodowitz United States
Hans Halbwachs Germany
Fang‐Hua Liu China
Alfred G. Wheeler United States
Noboru Katayama relative to T. L. Wilkinson United Kingdom T. L. Wilkinson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
T. L. Wilkinson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Noboru Katayama

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Noboru Katayama's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Noboru Katayama with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Noboru Katayama more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Noboru Katayama

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Noboru Katayama. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Noboru Katayama. The network helps show where Noboru Katayama may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Noboru Katayama, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Noboru Katayama Line = papers co-authored together Noboru Katayama links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201683
2 200245
3 200141
4 200340
5 200337
6 201236
7 201333
8 200431
9 200731
10 200425
11 201025
12 201025
13 201021
14 201120
15 201419
16 201018
17 201318
18 200818
19 201417
20 200516

About Noboru Katayama

Noboru Katayama is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Genetics, Insect Science and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, having authored 51 papers that have together received 790 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (26 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (18 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (17 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (9 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (8 papers), Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis (5 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (4 papers) and Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (356 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (477 citations), Genetics (322 citations), Plant Science (339 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (62 citations). Noboru Katayama has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United States and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Nobuhiko Suzuki, Takayuki Ohgushi, Osamu Kishida, Hiroshi Sakata, Hirokazu Toju, Kentaro Takagi, Takaaki Nishida, Masaru Hojo, David H. Hembry and Akira Yamawo. Their work appears in journals such as Population Ecology, Ecological Entomology, Applied Spectroscopy, Plant Ecology and Annals of the Entomological Society of America.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact