Noah Sherman

1.1k total citations
12 papers, 856 citations indexed

About

Noah Sherman is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Radiation. According to data from OpenAlex, Noah Sherman has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 856 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 4 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 3 papers in Radiation. Recurrent topics in Noah Sherman's work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (3 papers), Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques (3 papers) and Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (2 papers). Noah Sherman is often cited by papers focused on Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (3 papers), Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques (3 papers) and Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (2 papers). Noah Sherman collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Noah Sherman's co-authors include R. W. Richardson, J. L. Delcroix, J. K. Percus, Sidney Fernbach, D. F. Nelson, D.M. Brink, H. L. Anderson, S. Fukui, K. A. Klare and R. L. Martin and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, American Journal of Physics and Physical Review.

In The Last Decade

Noah Sherman

12 papers receiving 800 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Noah Sherman United States	10	486	249	219	150	149	12	856
W. G. Holladay United States	11	598 1.2×	337 1.4×	127 0.6×	56 0.4×	103 0.7×	32	912
Kazuhiko Nishijima Japan	12	477 1.0×	473 1.9×	58 0.3×	25 0.2×	66 0.4×	50	929
G. Holzwarth Germany	25	765 1.6×	1.2k 4.9×	209 1.0×	42 0.3×	70 0.5×	73	1.7k
R. Peierls United States	19	517 1.1×	643 2.6×	140 0.6×	41 0.3×	208 1.4×	44	1.4k
Leonard Eyges United States	12	359 0.7×	78 0.3×	127 0.6×	29 0.2×	27 0.2×	32	697
J. G. Wills United States	18	335 0.7×	562 2.3×	76 0.3×	21 0.1×	74 0.5×	37	903
M. Yu. Kuchiev Australia	22	1.2k 2.6×	341 1.4×	113 0.5×	99 0.7×	147 1.0×	72	1.4k
John L. Gammel United States	12	590 1.2×	502 2.0×	107 0.5×	27 0.2×	101 0.7×	19	955
H. L. Anderson United States	23	557 1.1×	902 3.6×	75 0.3×	38 0.3×	344 2.3×	62	1.5k
B. A. Lippmann United States	12	557 1.1×	240 1.0×	23 0.1×	60 0.4×	71 0.5×	25	734

Countries citing papers authored by Noah Sherman

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Noah Sherman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Noah Sherman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Noah Sherman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Noah Sherman

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Noah Sherman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Noah Sherman. The network helps show where Noah Sherman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Noah Sherman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Noah Sherman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Noah Sherman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Noah Sherman. Noah Sherman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

12 of 12 papers shown

1.

Anderson, H. L., S. Fukui, D. Kessler, et al.. (1967). Boson Production inp−pCollisions at 12.3 BeV/c. Physical Review Letters. 18(7). 276–276. 9 indexed citations

2.

Brink, D.M. & Noah Sherman. (1965). Rough Computation of the Separation Energy of Strongly Bound Nucleons. Physical Review Letters. 14(11). 393–395. 13 indexed citations

3.

Richardson, R. W. & Noah Sherman. (1964). Pairing models of Pb206, Pb204 and Pb202. Nuclear Physics. 52. 253–268. 88 indexed citations

4.

Richardson, R. W. & Noah Sherman. (1964). Exact eigenstates of the pairing-force Hamiltonian. Nuclear Physics. 52. 221–238. 341 indexed citations

5.

Sherman, Noah, et al.. (1963). Elastic scattering of relativistic electrons by screened atomic nuclei. Nuclear Physics. 45. 492–504. 74 indexed citations

6.

Delcroix, J. L. & Noah Sherman. (1961). Introduction to the Theory of Ionized Gases. American Journal of Physics. 29(9). 648–648. 71 indexed citations

7.

Sherman, Noah & D. F. Nelson. (1959). Determination of Electron Polarization by Means of Mott Scattering. Physical Review. 114(6). 1541–1542. 16 indexed citations

8.

Sherman, Noah, et al.. (1959). Physical Laws and Effects. American Journal of Physics. 27(9). 671–672. 16 indexed citations

9.

Fernbach, Sidney, et al.. (1956). Optical Model Analysis of Scattering of 14-Mev Neutrons. Physical Review. 101(3). 1047–1052. 28 indexed citations

10.

Sherman, Noah. (1956). Coulomb Scattering of Relativistic Electrons by Point Nuclei. Physical Review. 103(6). 1601–1607. 184 indexed citations

11.

Sherman, Noah. (1954). Atmospheric Temperature Effect forμMesons Observed at a Depth of 846 m.w.e.. Physical Review. 93(1). 208–211. 10 indexed citations

12.

Sherman, Noah. (1953). Diurnal Variations in the Intensity of Cosmic Rays Underground. Physical Review. 89(1). 25–26. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact