Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Metasurface Polarization Optics: Independent Phase Control of Arbitrary Orthogonal States of Polarization
20171.4k citationsJ. P. Balthasar Mueller, Noah A. Rubin et al.Physical Review Lettersprofile →
Arbitrary spin-to–orbital angular momentum conversion of light
2017993 citationsRobert C. Devlin, Antonio Ambrosio et al.Scienceprofile →
Matrix Fourier optics enables a compact full-Stokes polarization camera
2019705 citationsNoah A. Rubin, Paul Chevalier et al.Scienceprofile →
Metasurface optics for on-demand polarization transformations along the optical path
2021338 citationsAhmed H. Dorrah, Noah A. Rubin et al.Nature Photonicsprofile →
Metasurface-enabled single-shot and complete Mueller matrix imaging
202471 citationsAun Zaidi, Noah A. Rubin et al.Nature Photonicsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Noah A. Rubin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Noah A. Rubin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Noah A. Rubin more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Noah A. Rubin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Noah A. Rubin. The network helps show where Noah A. Rubin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Noah A. Rubin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Noah A. Rubin.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Noah A. Rubin based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Noah A. Rubin. Noah A. Rubin is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Zaidi, Aun, Noah A. Rubin, Ahmed H. Dorrah, Zhujun Shi, & Federico Capasso. (2021). Jones Matrix Holography with Metasurfaces. Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics. 4. SM4I.5–SM4I.5.1 indexed citations
8.
Dorrah, Ahmed H., Noah A. Rubin, Aun Zaidi, Michele Tamagnone, & Federico Capasso. (2020). Longitudinally Variable Polarization Optics. Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics. 57. FTh4A.2–FTh4A.2.1 indexed citations
Rubin, Noah A., et al.. (2019). Matrix Fourier optics enables a compact full-Stokes polarization camera. Science. 365(6448).705 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Groever, Benedikt, Noah A. Rubin, J. P. Balthasar Mueller, Robert C. Devlin, & Federico Capasso. (2018). High-efficiency chiral meta-lens. Scientific Reports. 8(1). 7240–7240.43 indexed citations
Devlin, Robert C., Antonio Ambrosio, Noah A. Rubin, J. P. Balthasar Mueller, & Federico Capasso. (2017). Arbitrary spin-to–orbital angular momentum conversion of light. Science. 358(6365). 896–901.993 indexed citations breakdown →
20.
Mueller, J. P. Balthasar, Noah A. Rubin, Robert C. Devlin, Benedikt Groever, & Federico Capasso. (2017). Metasurface Polarization Optics: Independent Phase Control of Arbitrary Orthogonal States of Polarization. Physical Review Letters. 118(11). 113901–113901.1365 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.