Noa Raz

1.7k citations
32 papers · 1.3k indexed · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Noa Raz

32 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Noa Raz
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 840
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 374
  • Ophthalmology 179
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 276
  • Neurology 83
Replace Herbert C. Goltz with:
Herbert C. Goltz Canada
Joanne Fielding Australia
Hubert Kimmig Germany
C. Pierrot‐Deseilligny France
Jennifer K. E. Steeves Canada
Jacques Honoré France
Uwe J. Ilg Germany
Linda Lillakas Canada
Nadia Alahyane France
André Gouws United Kingdom
Noa Raz relative to Herbert C. Goltz Canada Herbert C. Goltz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Herbert C. Goltz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Noa Raz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Noa Raz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Noa Raz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Noa Raz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Noa Raz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Noa Raz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Noa Raz. The network helps show where Noa Raz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Noa Raz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Noa Raz Line = papers co-authored together Noa Raz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003450
2 2005114
3 201096
4 201493
5 200781
6 201837
7 201137
8 201137
9 201736
10 201834
11 201329
12 201427
13 201219
14
Effortful and automatic processes associated with Down syndrome and nonspecific mental retardation.
199619
15 201918
16 201417
17 201614
18 201514
19
Early ‘visual’ cortex activation correlates with superior verbal memory in the blind
200314
20 201613

About Noa Raz

Noa Raz is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Neurology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (12 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (12 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (8 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (6 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (5 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (4 papers) and Multisensory perception and integration (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (840 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (374 citations), Ophthalmology (179 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (276 citations) and Neurology (83 citations). Noa Raz has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Ehud Zohary, Amir Amedi, Rafael Malach, Pazit Pianka, Netta Levin, Tamir Ben‐Hur, Sylvie Chokron, Golan Pundak, Ella Striem-Amit and Tanya Orlov. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, Multiple Sclerosis Journal, Journal of Neurology, Journal of Visualized Experiments and Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026