Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Taming the Blackbody with Infrared Metamaterials as Selective Thermal Emitters
20111.3k citationsXian‐Liang Liu, Talmage Tyler et al.profile →
Memory Metamaterials
2009732 citationsTom Driscoll, Hyun-Tak Kim et al.profile →
Design, theory, and measurement of a polarization-insensitive absorber for terahertz imaging
2009659 citationsTalmage Tyler, N.M. Jokerst et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of N.M. Jokerst's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N.M. Jokerst with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N.M. Jokerst more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by N.M. Jokerst. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N.M. Jokerst. The network helps show where N.M. Jokerst may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of N.M. Jokerst
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of N.M. Jokerst.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of N.M. Jokerst based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with N.M. Jokerst. N.M. Jokerst is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Ybarra, Gary, Leslie M. Collins, April S. Brown, et al.. (2011). Integrated Sensing and Information Processing Theme-Based Redesign of the Undergraduate Electrical and Computer Engineering Curriculum at Duke University.. AEE Journal. 2(4). 5.1 indexed citations
Kim, Daeik, et al.. (2004). An interferometric sensor for integration with Si CMOS signal processing circuitry: "Sensor on a chip". Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics. 1.3 indexed citations
12.
Seo, Sang‐Woo, Jiayun Shen, N.M. Jokerst, & April S. Brown. (2003). Large area, high speed InGaAs thin film MSMs for heterogeneously integrated optoelectronies. Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics. 457–460.
Vendier, O., Minah Lee, N.M. Jokerst, M.A. Brooke, & Richard P. Leavitt. (1996). Integrated 200 Mbit/s receiver: silicon CMOS transimpedance amplifier with a thin film InGaAs photodetector. Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics. 402–403.1 indexed citations
16.
Jokerst, N.M., et al.. (1995). Bidirectional communication through stacked silicon circuitry by using integrated thin-film InP-based emitters and detectors. Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics.2 indexed citations
17.
Vendier, O., N.M. Jokerst, & Richard P. Leavitt. (1995). High-efficiency inverted MSM photodetectors. Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics.6 indexed citations
18.
Jokerst, N.M., et al.. (1995). Bidirectional communication through stacked silicon circuitry by using integrated thin-film InP-based emitters. Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics.4 indexed citations
Jokerst, N.M. & E. Garmire. (1988). Nonlinear optical absorption in semiconductor epitaxial depletion regions. Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.