Nina Roth

443 total citations
9 papers, 324 citations indexed

About

Nina Roth is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Nina Roth has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 324 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 4 papers in Instrumentation and 1 paper in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Nina Roth's work include Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (7 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (4 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (4 papers). Nina Roth is often cited by papers focused on Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (7 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (4 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (4 papers). Nina Roth collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. Nina Roth's co-authors include Hiranya V. Peiris, Andrew Pontzen, Boris Leistedt, Fabio Governato, Tom Quinn, A. Saintonge, Michael Tremmel, Marta Volonteri, Anže Slosar and Martin P. Rey and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.

In The Last Decade

Nina Roth

9 papers receiving 316 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Nina Roth United Kingdom	7	316	155	42	29	9	9	324
David R. Cole United Kingdom	9	325 1.0×	143 0.9×	42 1.0×	15 0.5×	10 1.1×	12	333
Shuiyao Huang United States	10	298 0.9×	135 0.9×	56 1.3×	14 0.5×	7 0.8×	12	307
Alexander Arth Germany	4	288 0.9×	126 0.8×	60 1.4×	23 0.8×	8 0.9×	5	305
Robert Mostoghiu Australia	8	224 0.7×	136 0.9×	27 0.6×	13 0.4×	6 0.7×	9	233
O. G. Kashibadze Russia	11	461 1.5×	183 1.2×	87 2.1×	22 0.8×	6 0.7×	14	485
Carlos Vera-Ciro Colombia	8	335 1.1×	138 0.9×	53 1.3×	22 0.8×	27 3.0×	19	380
Maarten A. Breddels Netherlands	6	302 1.0×	133 0.9×	104 2.5×	23 0.8×	8 0.9×	10	325
Roan Haggar United Kingdom	10	279 0.9×	177 1.1×	31 0.7×	16 0.6×	7 0.8×	15	293
Tiziana DiMatteo United States	7	315 1.0×	157 1.0×	63 1.5×	16 0.6×	9 1.0×	19	333
Neven Čaplar United States	10	437 1.4×	210 1.4×	49 1.2×	17 0.6×	11 1.2×	18	462

Countries citing papers authored by Nina Roth

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nina Roth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina Roth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina Roth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nina Roth

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina Roth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina Roth. The network helps show where Nina Roth may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nina Roth

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nina Roth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nina Roth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nina Roth. Nina Roth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Pontzen, Andrew, et al.. (2021). GenetIC—A New Initial Conditions Generator to Support Genetically Modified Zoom Simulations. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 252(2). 28–28. 32 indexed citations

2.

Pontzen, Andrew, et al.. (2020). GenetIC: Initial conditions generator for cosmological simulations. Astrophysics Source Code Library. 1 indexed citations

3.

Dreier, Michael, et al.. (2019). Glücksspielcharakter von Computerspielen. Suchttherapie. 20(4). 198–202. 1 indexed citations

4.

Pontzen, Andrew, Michael Tremmel, Nina Roth, et al.. (2016). How to quench a galaxy. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 465(1). 547–558. 92 indexed citations

5.

Pontzen, Andrew, Anže Slosar, Nina Roth, & Hiranya V. Peiris. (2016). Inverted initial conditions: Exploring the growth of cosmic structure and voids. Physical review. D. 93(10). 39 indexed citations

6.

Roth, Nina, Andrew Pontzen, & Hiranya V. Peiris. (2015). Genetically modified haloes: towards controlled experiments in ΛCDM galaxy formation. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 455(1). 974–986. 48 indexed citations

7.

Pontzen, Andrew, Justin I. Read, Romain Teyssier, et al.. (2015). Milking the spherical cow – on aspherical dynamics in spherical coordinates. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 451(2). 1366–1379. 25 indexed citations

8.

Leistedt, Boris, Hiranya V. Peiris, & Nina Roth. (2014). Constraints on Primordial Non-Gaussianity from800 000Photometric Quasars. Physical Review Letters. 113(22). 221301–221301. 74 indexed citations

9.

Roth, Nina & C. Porciani. (2012). Can we really measure ƒNL from the galaxy power spectrum?. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters. 425(1). L81–L85. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact