Nina Rösser

758 total citations
11 papers, 581 citations indexed

About

Nina Rösser is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology and Rehabilitation. According to data from OpenAlex, Nina Rösser has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 581 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 4 papers in Neurology and 3 papers in Rehabilitation. Recurrent topics in Nina Rösser's work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (3 papers), Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction (3 papers) and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (3 papers). Nina Rösser is often cited by papers focused on Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (3 papers), Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction (3 papers) and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (3 papers). Nina Rösser collaborates with scholars based in Germany and United States. Nina Rösser's co-authors include Agnes Flöel, Stefan Knecht, Caterina Breitenstein, Karl Wessel, Bruno Kopp, Hans Jörg Stürenburg, Bianca de Haan, Hans‐Otto Karnath, Peter U. Heuschmann and Heike Wersching and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Physiology & Behavior.

In The Last Decade

Nina Rösser

11 papers receiving 572 citations

Peers

Nina Rösser

CN

NEURO

REHAB

PMH

NEURO

Jenin El‐Sayes Canada

D. Tombari Italy

Lizbeth Cárdenas‐Morales Germany

Ann‐Maree Vallence Australia

Yutaka Oouchida Japan

Fabian Rossi United States

Alexander Mishory United States

Judy Kipping Germany

Jing Tian China

Juliana Bittencourt Brazil

Jenin El‐Sayes Canada

Nina Rösser

252 ×0.7

CN

339 ×1.1

NEURO

80 ×0.8

REHAB

65 ×0.8

PMH

69 ×1.0

NEURO

Citations per year, relative to Nina Rösser Nina Rösser (= 1×) peers Jenin El‐Sayes

Countries citing papers authored by Nina Rösser

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nina Rösser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina Rösser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina Rösser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nina Rösser

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina Rösser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina Rösser. The network helps show where Nina Rösser may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nina Rösser

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nina Rösser. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nina Rösser based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nina Rösser. Nina Rösser is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Kopp, Bruno, Nina Rösser, Hans Jörg Stürenburg, et al.. (2015). Errors on the Trail Making Test Are Associated with Right Hemispheric Frontal Lobe Damage in Stroke Patients. Behavioural Neurology. 2015. 1–10. 55 indexed citations

2.

Kopp, Bruno, Nina Rösser, Hans Jörg Stürenburg, et al.. (2014). Disorganized behavior on Link's cube test is sensitive to right hemispheric frontal lobe damage in stroke patients. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 8. 79–79. 7 indexed citations

3.

Kopp, Bruno, Nina Rösser, Hans Jörg Stürenburg, et al.. (2013). Performance on the Frontal Assessment Battery is sensitive to frontal lobe damage in stroke patients. BMC Neurology. 13(1). 179–179. 46 indexed citations

4.

Meinzer, Marcus, Caterina Breitenstein, Jens Sommer, et al.. (2010). Motor Cortex Preactivation by Standing Facilitates Word Retrieval in Aphasia. Neurorehabilitation and neural repair. 25(2). 178–187. 28 indexed citations

5.

Rösser, Nina & Agnes Flöel. (2009). 12. Levodopa improves procedural motor learning in chronic stroke patients. Clinical Neurophysiology. 120(1). e11–e11. 1 indexed citations

6.

Rösser, Nina, Peter U. Heuschmann, Heike Wersching, et al.. (2008). Levodopa Improves Procedural Motor Learning in Chronic Stroke Patients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 89(9). 1633–1641. 69 indexed citations

7.

Rösser, Nina, et al.. (2008). Lack of improvement in odor identification by levodopa in humans. Physiology & Behavior. 93(4-5). 1024–1029. 15 indexed citations

8.

Flöel, Agnes, et al.. (2008). Noninvasive Brain Stimulation Improves Language Learning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 20(8). 1415–1422. 309 indexed citations

9.

Rösser, Nina & Agnes Flöel. (2008). Pharmacological enhancement of motor recovery in subacute and chronic stroke. Neurorehabilitation. 23(1). 95–103. 42 indexed citations

10.

Kopp, Bruno, Nina Rösser, & Karl Wessel. (2008). Psychometric Characteristics and Practice Effects of the Brunswick Trail Making Test. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 107(3). 707–733. 8 indexed citations

11.

Rösser, Nina & Agnes Flöel. (2008). Levodopa improves procedural motor learning in chronic stroke patients. Klinische Neurophysiologie. 39(1). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact