Nina J Berry

780 total citations
21 papers, 595 citations indexed

About

Nina J Berry is a scholar working on Epidemiology, General Health Professions and Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Nina J Berry has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 595 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Epidemiology, 8 papers in General Health Professions and 5 papers in Health. Recurrent topics in Nina J Berry's work include Breastfeeding Practices and Influences (12 papers), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (5 papers) and Child Nutrition and Water Access (3 papers). Nina J Berry is often cited by papers focused on Breastfeeding Practices and Influences (12 papers), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (5 papers) and Child Nutrition and Water Access (3 papers). Nina J Berry collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Canada. Nina J Berry's co-authors include Sandra C. Jones, Karleen Gribble, Don Iverson, Julie Leask, Lance Barrie, Lyndal Trevena, Margie Danchin, Robin Callister, Patrick McElduff and Myles D. Young and has published in prestigious journals such as BMC Public Health, Vaccine and Archives of Disease in Childhood.

In The Last Decade

Nina J Berry

21 papers receiving 573 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Nina J Berry Australia 16 267 160 155 130 112 21 595
Kimberly B. Garza United States 13 105 0.4× 217 1.4× 179 1.2× 52 0.4× 52 0.5× 64 707
Farzad Ebrahimzadeh Iran 14 172 0.6× 101 0.6× 145 0.9× 52 0.4× 78 0.7× 89 776
Angela Bermúdez‐Millán United States 16 193 0.7× 371 2.3× 226 1.5× 48 0.4× 151 1.3× 48 822
Mohd Azahadi Omar Malaysia 15 91 0.3× 127 0.8× 162 1.0× 63 0.5× 43 0.4× 35 659
Alex Chung Australia 14 123 0.5× 243 1.5× 511 3.3× 43 0.3× 70 0.6× 47 827
Anna S. Howe New Zealand 15 153 0.6× 99 0.6× 190 1.2× 95 0.7× 47 0.4× 32 716
Megan M. Pinkston United States 15 332 1.2× 325 2.0× 433 2.8× 116 0.9× 24 0.2× 45 1.3k
Elisabetta De Vito Italy 13 150 0.6× 394 2.5× 185 1.2× 141 1.1× 14 0.1× 45 913
Carla Bernardo Australia 14 147 0.6× 98 0.6× 145 0.9× 86 0.7× 37 0.3× 37 518
Josefa L. Martinez‐Brockman United States 12 435 1.6× 222 1.4× 234 1.5× 29 0.2× 194 1.7× 30 752

Countries citing papers authored by Nina J Berry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nina J Berry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina J Berry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina J Berry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nina J Berry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina J Berry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina J Berry. The network helps show where Nina J Berry may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nina J Berry

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nina J Berry. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nina J Berry based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nina J Berry. Nina J Berry is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Valtchev, Peter, et al.. (2020). The risk of infectious pathogens in breast-feeding, donated human milk and breast milk substitutes. Public Health Nutrition. 24(7). 1725–1740. 22 indexed citations
2.
Randall, Sue, Julie Leask, Margie Danchin, et al.. (2019). Underpinning of the sharing knowledge about immunisation (SKAI) communication approach: A qualitative study using recorded observations. Patient Education and Counseling. 103(6). 1118–1124. 19 indexed citations
3.
Berry, Nina J, Margie Danchin, Lyndal Trevena, et al.. (2018). Sharing knowledge about immunisation (SKAI): An exploration of parents’ communication needs to inform development of a clinical communication support intervention. Vaccine. 36(44). 6480–6490. 41 indexed citations
4.
Berry, Nina J, et al.. (2017). When parents won’t vaccinate their children: a qualitative investigation of australian primary care providers’ experiences. BMC Pediatrics. 17(1). 19–19. 54 indexed citations
5.
Wiley, Kerrie, Maryke Steffens, Nina J Berry, & Julie Leask. (2017). An audit of the quality of online immunisation information available to Australian parents. BMC Public Health. 17(1). 76–76. 25 indexed citations
6.
Gribble, Karleen, et al.. (2016). Volume marker inaccuracies: A cross‐sectional survey of infant feeding bottles. Maternal and Child Nutrition. 13(3). 7 indexed citations
7.
Jones, Sandra C., et al.. (2016). Lost in translation: a focus group study of parents’ and adolescents’ interpretations of underage drinking and parental supply. BMC Public Health. 16(1). 561–561. 25 indexed citations
8.
Berry, Nina J & Karleen Gribble. (2016). Health and nutrition content claims on websites advertising infant formula available in Australia: A content analysis. Maternal and Child Nutrition. 13(4). 23 indexed citations
9.
Morgan, Philip J., Robin Callister, Clare E. Collins, et al.. (2012). The SHED-IT Community Trial: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Internet- and Paper-Based Weight Loss Programs Tailored for Overweight and Obese Men. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 45(2). 139–152. 109 indexed citations
10.
Berry, Nina J, Sandra C. Jones, & Don Iverson. (2012). It's not the contents, it's the container: Australian parents' awareness and acceptance of infant and young child feeding recommendations.. PubMed. 20(2). 31–5. 4 indexed citations
11.
Jones, Sandra C., Lance Barrie, & Nina J Berry. (2011). Why (not) alcohol energy drinks? A qualitative study with Australian university students. Drug and Alcohol Review. 31(3). 281–287. 55 indexed citations
12.
Gribble, Karleen & Nina J Berry. (2011). Emergency preparedness for those who care for infants in developed country contexts. International Breastfeeding Journal. 6(1). 16–16. 16 indexed citations
13.
Berry, Nina J, Sandra C. Jones, & Don Iverson. (2011). Relax, you're soaking in it: sources of information about infant formula.. PubMed. 19(1). 9–18. 16 indexed citations
14.
Berry, Nina J, Sandra C. Jones, & Don Iverson. (2011). Circumventing the WHO Code? An observational study. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 97(4). 320–325. 32 indexed citations
15.
Berry, Nina J, Sandra C. Jones, & Don Iverson. (2011). Toddler Milk Advertising in Australia: Infant Formula Advertising in Disguise?. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ). 20(1). 24–27. 27 indexed citations
16.
Morgan, Philip J., Clare E. Collins, Ronald C. Plotnikoff, et al.. (2010). The SHED-IT community trial study protocol: a randomised controlled trial of weight loss programs for overweight and obese men. BMC Public Health. 10(1). 701–701. 28 indexed citations
17.
Berry, Nina J, Sandra C. Jones, & Don Iverson. (2010). It's all formula to me: women's understandings of toddler milk ads.. PubMed. 18(1). 21–30. 46 indexed citations
18.
Berry, Nina J, Sandra C. Jones, & Donald C. Iverson. (2010). Toddler milk advertising in Australia: the infant formula ads we have when we don’t have infant formula ads. Research Online (University of Wollongong). 1–8. 2 indexed citations
19.
Berry, Nina J. (2010). Got milk? : the influence of toddler formula advertising on attitudes and beliefs about infant feeding. Research Online (University of Wollongong). 3 indexed citations
20.
Berry, Nina J & Karleen Gribble. (2007). Breast is no longer best: promoting normal infant feeding. Maternal and Child Nutrition. 4(1). 74–79. 35 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026