Nina Cedergreen

8.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
118 papers, 5.6k citations indexed

About

Nina Cedergreen is a scholar working on Pollution, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Nina Cedergreen has authored 118 papers receiving a total of 5.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 60 papers in Pollution, 60 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and 51 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Nina Cedergreen's work include Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (53 papers), Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies (48 papers) and Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts (21 papers). Nina Cedergreen is often cited by papers focused on Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (53 papers), Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies (48 papers) and Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts (21 papers). Nina Cedergreen collaborates with scholars based in Denmark, United States and United Kingdom. Nina Cedergreen's co-authors include J. C. Streibig, Tom Vindbæk Madsen, Helle Sørensen, Solvejg K. Mathiassen, Per Kudsk, Regina G. Belz, Christian Ritz, Stephen O. Duke, Kristoffer Dalhoff and Andreas Kretschmann and has published in prestigious journals such as Environmental Science & Technology, PLoS ONE and The Science of The Total Environment.

In The Last Decade

Nina Cedergreen

117 papers receiving 5.4k citations

Hit Papers

Quantifying Synergy: A Systematic Review of Mixture Toxic... 2014 2026 2018 2022 2014 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Nina Cedergreen Denmark 43 2.4k 2.2k 1.9k 684 680 118 5.6k
Daniel A. Wunderlin Argentina 44 1.7k 0.7× 2.0k 0.9× 884 0.5× 915 1.3× 510 0.8× 150 5.6k
Ashwani Kumar Thukral India 36 2.1k 0.9× 885 0.4× 2.6k 1.4× 262 0.4× 456 0.7× 91 6.3k
Zdeňka Svobodová Czechia 47 3.0k 1.2× 4.2k 1.9× 1.0k 0.5× 312 0.5× 447 0.7× 320 8.5k
Marco Vighi Italy 46 2.7k 1.1× 3.2k 1.4× 594 0.3× 965 1.4× 769 1.1× 191 6.8k
Hong Yang China 48 2.3k 1.0× 2.0k 0.9× 1.8k 0.9× 242 0.4× 314 0.5× 167 6.5k
Colin D. Brown United Kingdom 40 2.6k 1.1× 1.3k 0.6× 778 0.4× 617 0.9× 390 0.6× 134 4.7k
Ronald S. Tjeerdema United States 40 1.9k 0.8× 2.3k 1.0× 825 0.4× 551 0.8× 471 0.7× 183 6.3k
José Tarazona Spain 34 2.4k 1.0× 2.7k 1.2× 646 0.3× 415 0.6× 246 0.4× 219 5.4k
Jesús Olivero‐Verbel Colombia 39 1.3k 0.5× 1.7k 0.7× 1.9k 1.0× 200 0.3× 1.0k 1.5× 195 5.4k
Yoshinori Ikenaka Japan 40 2.0k 0.8× 2.6k 1.2× 646 0.3× 176 0.3× 755 1.1× 287 5.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Nina Cedergreen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nina Cedergreen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina Cedergreen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina Cedergreen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nina Cedergreen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina Cedergreen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina Cedergreen. The network helps show where Nina Cedergreen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nina Cedergreen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nina Cedergreen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nina Cedergreen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nina Cedergreen. Nina Cedergreen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Tisler, Selina, et al.. (2025). Mapping Emerging Contaminants in Wastewater Effluents through Multichromatographic Platform Analysis and Source Correlations. Environmental Science & Technology. 59(11). 5766–5774. 3 indexed citations
2.
Strobel, Bjarne W., et al.. (2021). Toxicity and risk of plant-produced alkaloids to Daphnia magna. Environmental Sciences Europe. 33(1). 37 indexed citations
3.
Cedergreen, Nina, et al.. (2021). Using TKTD Models in Combination withIn VivoEnzyme Inhibition Assays to Investigate the Mechanisms behind Synergistic Interactions across Two Species. Environmental Science & Technology. 55(20). 13990–13999. 3 indexed citations
4.
Magid, Jakob, et al.. (2021). Long-term fertilization with urban and animal wastes enhances soil quality but introduces pharmaceuticals and personal care products. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 42(1). 9 indexed citations
5.
Jensen, Signe Marie, Felix M. Kluxen, J. C. Streibig, Nina Cedergreen, & Christian Ritz. (2020). bmd : an R package for benchmark dose estimation. PeerJ. 8. e10557–e10557. 14 indexed citations
6.
Dalhoff, Kristoffer, et al.. (2020). Linking Morphology, Toxicokinetic, and Toxicodynamic Traits of Aquatic Invertebrates to Pyrethroid Sensitivity. Environmental Science & Technology. 54(9). 5687–5699. 32 indexed citations
8.
Cao, Yi, et al.. (2019). A comparative study of acetylcholinesterase and general-esterase activity assays using different substrates, in vitro and in vivo exposures and model organisms. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 189. 109954–109954. 6 indexed citations
9.
Pedersen, Kathrine Eggers, Brian L. Fredensborg, Annette Bruun Jensen, & Nina Cedergreen. (2019). Quantification of the activity of detoxifying enzymes in terrestrial invertebrates: Optimization, evaluation and use of in vitro and ex vivo methods. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 10(5). 726–734. 3 indexed citations
10.
Dalhoff, Kristoffer, et al.. (2018). Seasonal sensitivity of Gammarus pulex towards the pyrethroid cypermethrin. Chemosphere. 200. 632–640. 19 indexed citations
11.
Cedergreen, Nina, et al.. (2017). Can Toxicokinetic and Toxicodynamic Modeling Be Used to Understand and Predict Synergistic Interactions between Chemicals?. Environmental Science & Technology. 51(24). 14379–14389. 40 indexed citations
12.
Cedergreen, Nina, et al.. (2017). Refined assessment and perspectives on the cumulative risk resulting from the dietary exposure to pesticide residues in the Danish population. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 111. 207–267. 15 indexed citations
13.
Rösch, Andrea, et al.. (2017). Mechanistic Understanding of the Synergistic Potential of Azole Fungicides in the Aquatic Invertebrate Gammarus pulex. Environmental Science & Technology. 51(21). 12784–12795. 42 indexed citations
15.
Dalhoff, Kristoffer, et al.. (2015). What causes the difference in synergistic potentials of propiconazole and prochloraz toward pyrethroids in Daphnia magna?. Aquatic Toxicology. 172. 95–102. 25 indexed citations
16.
Fang, Liping, Ole K. Borggaard, Peter E. Holm, Hans Christian Bruun Hansen, & Nina Cedergreen. (2011). Toxicity and uptake of TRI- and dibutyltin in Daphnia magna in the absence and presence of nano-charcoal. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 30(11). 2553–2561. 18 indexed citations
17.
Belz, Regina G., Nina Cedergreen, & Stephen O. Duke. (2011). Herbicide hormesis – can it be useful in crop production?. Weed Research. 51(4). 321–332. 85 indexed citations
18.
Cedergreen, Nina, et al.. (2010). Plant Growth Is Stimulated by Tea-seed Extract: A New Natural Growth Regulator?. HortScience. 45(12). 1848–1853. 32 indexed citations
19.
Syberg, Kristian, et al.. (2007). Mixture toxicity of three toxicants with similar and dissimilar modes of action to Daphnia magna. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 69(3). 428–436. 94 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026