Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Niels Landwehr
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Niels Landwehr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Niels Landwehr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Niels Landwehr more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Niels Landwehr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Niels Landwehr. The network helps show where Niels Landwehr may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Niels Landwehr
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Niels Landwehr.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Niels Landwehr based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Niels Landwehr. Niels Landwehr is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kuehn, Nicolas, Sreeram Reddy Kotha, & Niels Landwehr. (2019). A Non-ergodic GMPE for Europe and the Middle East with Spatially Varying Coefficients. Publication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences). 11166.2 indexed citations
Frasconi, Paolo, Niels Landwehr, Giuseppe Manco, & Jilles Vreeken. (2016). Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases (ECML PKDD 2016). Springer eBooks.15 indexed citations
9.
Prasse, Paul, et al.. (2015). Learning to identify concise regular expressions that describe email campaigns. Journal of Machine Learning Research. 16(1). 3687–3720.9 indexed citations
10.
Prasse, Paul, et al.. (2012). Learning to Identify Regular Expressions that Describe Email Campaigns. International Conference on Machine Learning. 1115–1122.5 indexed citations
11.
Landwehr, Niels, et al.. (2012). Active Comparison of Prediction Models. Neural Information Processing Systems. 25. 1754–1762.2 indexed citations
12.
Landwehr, Niels, et al.. (2010). Active Estimation of F-Measures. Neural Information Processing Systems. 23. 2083–2091.11 indexed citations
13.
Thon, Ingo, et al.. (2009). Probabilistic logical sequence learning for video. Lirias (KU Leuven).5 indexed citations
Raedt, Luc De, Bart Demoen, Daan Fierens, et al.. (2008). Towards digesting the alphabet-soup of statistical relational learning. Lirias (KU Leuven).17 indexed citations
Landwehr, Niels, Kristian Kersting, & Luc De Raedt. (2007). Integrating Naïve Bayes and FOIL. Journal of Machine Learning Research. 8(18). 481–507.36 indexed citations
19.
Landwehr, Niels, Andrea Passerini, Luc De Raedt, & Paolo Frasconi. (2006). kFOIL: learning simple relational kernels. Lirias (KU Leuven). 389–394.46 indexed citations
20.
Landwehr, Niels, et al.. (2006). Constrained hidden Markov models for population-based haplotyping (Extended Abstract). BMC Bioinformatics. 8. 1–6.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.