Nicoleta Schiopu

663 total citations
17 papers, 429 citations indexed

About

Nicoleta Schiopu is a scholar working on Building and Construction, Environmental Engineering and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. According to data from OpenAlex, Nicoleta Schiopu has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 429 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Building and Construction, 8 papers in Environmental Engineering and 3 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. Recurrent topics in Nicoleta Schiopu's work include Environmental Impact and Sustainability (7 papers), Sustainable Building Design and Assessment (6 papers) and Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance (4 papers). Nicoleta Schiopu is often cited by papers focused on Environmental Impact and Sustainability (7 papers), Sustainable Building Design and Assessment (6 papers) and Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance (4 papers). Nicoleta Schiopu collaborates with scholars based in France, Germany and Switzerland. Nicoleta Schiopu's co-authors include Ligia Tiruta-Barna, Jacques Chevalier, Sébastien Lasvaux, Alexandra Lebert, Benedetto Rugani, Didier Beloin‐Saint‐Pierre, Enrico Benetto, Jacques Méhu, Pierre Moszkowicz and Philippe Clergeau and has published in prestigious journals such as The Science of The Total Environment, Journal of Hazardous Materials and Journal of Cleaner Production.

In The Last Decade

Nicoleta Schiopu

16 papers receiving 421 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Nicoleta Schiopu France 11 263 236 43 42 33 17 429
Aurora L. Sharrard United States 6 230 0.9× 280 1.2× 45 1.0× 16 0.4× 28 0.8× 8 440
Damien Trigaux Belgium 9 333 1.3× 346 1.5× 25 0.6× 24 0.6× 20 0.6× 32 471
Robert Phillips United States 7 199 0.8× 224 0.9× 39 0.9× 39 0.9× 19 0.6× 8 349
Walaa S.E. Ismaeel Egypt 16 130 0.5× 391 1.7× 39 0.9× 45 1.1× 31 0.9× 33 513
Anders Wadeskog Sweden 7 365 1.4× 261 1.1× 16 0.4× 17 0.4× 27 0.8× 17 508
Thomas Jusselme Switzerland 15 412 1.6× 455 1.9× 29 0.7× 27 0.6× 19 0.6× 51 615
Peter Andreas Sattrup Denmark 4 279 1.1× 318 1.3× 18 0.4× 82 2.0× 43 1.3× 10 437
Elisabeth Keijzer Netherlands 8 196 0.7× 187 0.8× 98 2.3× 38 0.9× 17 0.5× 14 413
Annette Hafner Germany 9 254 1.0× 288 1.2× 40 0.9× 38 0.9× 18 0.5× 28 426
Chanjief Chandrakumar New Zealand 12 308 1.2× 163 0.7× 30 0.7× 58 1.4× 23 0.7× 18 537

Countries citing papers authored by Nicoleta Schiopu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicoleta Schiopu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicoleta Schiopu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicoleta Schiopu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicoleta Schiopu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicoleta Schiopu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicoleta Schiopu. The network helps show where Nicoleta Schiopu may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicoleta Schiopu

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicoleta Schiopu. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicoleta Schiopu based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicoleta Schiopu. Nicoleta Schiopu is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Schiopu, Nicoleta, et al.. (2023). Environmental performance of districts: results of a French national assessment campaign. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science. 1196(1). 12051–12051.
2.
Schiopu, Nicoleta, et al.. (2023). Performance assessment of the ecosystem services provided by urban Nature-based solutions: focus on rainwater management. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science. 1196(1). 12028–12028. 4 indexed citations
3.
Schiopu, Nicoleta, et al.. (2019). Biodiversity impact assessment of building's roofs based on Life Cycle Assessment methods. Building and Environment. 158. 133–144. 21 indexed citations
4.
Tiruta-Barna, Ligia, et al.. (2018). An operational methodology for applying dynamic Life Cycle Assessment to buildings. Building and Environment. 144. 611–621. 85 indexed citations
5.
Lasvaux, Sébastien, et al.. (2017). Towards guidance values for the environmental performance of buildings: application to the statistical analysis of 40 low-energy single family houses’ LCA in France. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 22(5). 657–674. 43 indexed citations
6.
Beloin‐Saint‐Pierre, Didier, et al.. (2016). A review of urban metabolism studies to identify key methodological choices for future harmonization and implementation. Journal of Cleaner Production. 163. S223–S240. 100 indexed citations
7.
Lasvaux, Sébastien, Johannes Gantner, Bastian Wittstock, et al.. (2014). Achieving consistency in life cycle assessment practice within the European construction sector: the role of the EeBGuide InfoHub. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 19(11). 1783–1793. 35 indexed citations
8.
Lasvaux, Sébastien, Nicoleta Schiopu, Guillaume Habert, Jacques Chevalier, & Bruno Peuportier. (2014). Influence of simplification of life cycle inventories on the accuracy of impact assessment: application to construction products. Journal of Cleaner Production. 79. 142–151. 28 indexed citations
9.
Tiruta-Barna, Ligia, et al.. (2013). Modelling inorganic and organic biocide leaching from CBA-amine (Copper–Boron–Azole) treated wood based on characterisation leaching tests. The Science of The Total Environment. 461-462. 645–654. 8 indexed citations
10.
Schoknecht, Ute, et al.. (2013). Biocide leaching from CBA treated wood — A mechanistic interpretation. The Science of The Total Environment. 444. 522–530. 9 indexed citations
11.
Tiruta-Barna, Ligia, et al.. (2013). Leaching of hazardous substances from a composite construction product – An experimental and modelling approach for fibre-cement sheets. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 264. 236–245. 18 indexed citations
12.
Häkkinen, Tarja, et al.. (2013). Land Use as an Aspect of Sustainable Building. 1(1). 10 indexed citations
13.
Zomeren, A. van, Rob N.J. Comans, Ole Hjelmar, et al.. (2012). Robustness validation of two harmonized European leaching tests for assessment of the leaching of construction products, including waste-based construction materials. 3 indexed citations
14.
Schoknecht, Ute, et al.. (2012). Leaching from new generation treated wood: a chemical approach. WIT transactions on ecology and the environment. 1. 529–540. 7 indexed citations
15.
Tiruta-Barna, Ligia & Nicoleta Schiopu. (2011). Modelling inorganic biocide emission from treated wood in water. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 192(3). 1476–1483. 11 indexed citations
16.
Schiopu, Nicoleta, et al.. (2009). Modelling and simulation of concrete leaching under outdoor exposure conditions. The Science of The Total Environment. 407(5). 1613–1630. 34 indexed citations
17.
Schiopu, Nicoleta, et al.. (2007). Horizontal environmental assessment of building products in relation to the construction products directive (CPD). Waste Management. 27(10). 1436–1443. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026