Nicolas Pech

2.9k total citations · 1 hit paper
43 papers, 2.3k citations indexed

About

Nicolas Pech is a scholar working on Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Nicolas Pech has authored 43 papers receiving a total of 2.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Genetics, 15 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 13 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in Nicolas Pech's work include Genetic diversity and population structure (12 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (11 papers) and Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (9 papers). Nicolas Pech is often cited by papers focused on Genetic diversity and population structure (12 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (11 papers) and Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (9 papers). Nicolas Pech collaborates with scholars based in France, Brazil and Australia. Nicolas Pech's co-authors include André Gilles, Emese Meglécz, Thibaut Malausa, Caroline Costedoat, Vincent Dubut, Jean‐François Martin, Stéphanie Ferreira, Rémi Chappaz, Miguel Tréfaut Rodrigues and Antoine Fouquet and has published in prestigious journals such as Bioinformatics, PLoS ONE and Water Research.

In The Last Decade

Nicolas Pech

42 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Hit Papers

QDD: a user-friendly program to select microsatellite mar... 2009 2026 2014 2020 2009 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Nicolas Pech France 20 1.0k 814 635 413 382 43 2.3k
Adam D. Miller Australia 28 850 0.8× 656 0.8× 934 1.5× 353 0.9× 270 0.7× 87 2.3k
Peter J. Prentis Australia 25 879 0.9× 673 0.8× 920 1.4× 791 1.9× 624 1.6× 91 2.9k
S. Aljanabi Brazil 16 1.0k 1.0× 1.0k 1.3× 728 1.1× 413 1.0× 1.2k 3.1× 23 3.4k
Luc Baudouin France 17 1.8k 1.8× 554 0.7× 1.2k 1.9× 380 0.9× 797 2.1× 74 3.1k
Kailash Chandra India 19 529 0.5× 575 0.7× 685 1.1× 575 1.4× 332 0.9× 409 2.1k
Steve Jordan United States 17 1.1k 1.1× 421 0.5× 563 0.9× 333 0.8× 236 0.6× 38 2.0k
Inger Skrede Norway 18 1.4k 1.4× 600 0.7× 694 1.1× 835 2.0× 917 2.4× 48 2.8k
Gregory A. C. Singer Canada 18 718 0.7× 2.1k 2.6× 1.5k 2.3× 436 1.1× 262 0.7× 20 3.1k
Anti Vasemägi Estonia 33 1.7k 1.7× 766 0.9× 1.1k 1.7× 324 0.8× 241 0.6× 107 3.1k
Luisa Orsini United Kingdom 28 783 0.8× 563 0.7× 1.0k 1.6× 452 1.1× 212 0.6× 68 2.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Nicolas Pech

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicolas Pech's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicolas Pech with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicolas Pech more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicolas Pech

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicolas Pech. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicolas Pech. The network helps show where Nicolas Pech may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicolas Pech

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicolas Pech. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicolas Pech based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicolas Pech. Nicolas Pech is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gilles, André, et al.. (2022). Breaking the reproductive barrier of divergent species to explore the genomic landscape. Frontiers in Genetics. 13. 963341–963341. 1 indexed citations
2.
Guivier, Emmanuel, et al.. (2017). Microbiota Diversity Within and Between the Tissues of Two Wild Interbreeding Species. Microbial Ecology. 75(3). 799–810. 11 indexed citations
3.
Pech, Nicolas, Jean‐François Martin, R. J. Scott McCairns, et al.. (2017). Challenges and advances for transcriptome assembly in non-model species. PLoS ONE. 12(9). e0185020–e0185020. 30 indexed citations
6.
Pustahija, Fatima, et al.. (2014). Is it possible to identify Colchicum neapolitanum s.l. and C. autumnale s.l. in vegetative stage? Biometry and flow cytometry approaches. Botanica Serbica. 38(1). 43–56. 3 indexed citations
7.
Pech, Nicolas, et al.. (2014). Evolutionary history of Chaetognatha inferred from molecular and morphological data: a case study for body plan simplification. Frontiers in Zoology. 11(1). 84–84. 18 indexed citations
8.
Gilles, André, Caroline Costedoat, Emmanuel Corse, et al.. (2013). Non-homogeneous combination of two porous genomes induces complex body shape trajectories in cyprinid hybrids. Frontiers in Zoology. 10(1). 22–22. 11 indexed citations
9.
Meglécz, Emese, et al.. (2012). A shot in the genome: how accurately do shotgun 454 sequences represent a genome?. BMC Research Notes. 5(1). 259–259. 7 indexed citations
10.
Malausa, Thibaut, André Gilles, Emese Meglécz, et al.. (2011). High‐throughput microsatellite isolation through 454 GS‐FLX Titanium pyrosequencing of enriched DNA libraries. Molecular Ecology Resources. 11(4). 638–644. 265 indexed citations
11.
Gilles, André, Emese Meglécz, Nicolas Pech, et al.. (2011). Accuracy and quality assessment of 454 GS-FLX Titanium pyrosequencing. BMC Genomics. 12(1). 245–245. 286 indexed citations
12.
Dubut, Vincent, Caroline Costedoat, M. Junker, et al.. (2011). Challenges of microsatellite development in Lepidoptera: Euphydryas aurinia (Nymphalidae) as a case study. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 35 indexed citations
13.
Martin, Jean‐François, Nicolas Pech, Emese Meglécz, et al.. (2010). Representativeness of microsatellite distributions in genomes, as revealed by 454 GS-FLX Titanium pyrosequencing. BMC Genomics. 11(1). 560–560. 25 indexed citations
14.
Corse, Emmanuel, Caroline Costedoat, Nicolas Pech, et al.. (2009). Trade-off between morphological convergence and opportunistic diet behavior in fish hybrid zone. Frontiers in Zoology. 6(1). 26–26. 14 indexed citations
15.
Corse, Emmanuel, Caroline Costedoat, Rémi Chappaz, et al.. (2009). A PCR‐based method for diet analysis in freshwater organisms using 18S rDNA barcoding on faeces. Molecular Ecology Resources. 10(1). 96–108. 81 indexed citations
16.
Hassouna, Mélynda, C. Massiani, Yves Dudal, Nicolas Pech, & F. Théraulaz. (2009). Changes in water extractable organic matter (WEOM) in a calcareous soil under field conditions with time and soil depth. Geoderma. 155(1-2). 75–85. 80 indexed citations
17.
Dubut, Vincent, et al.. (2009). Inter‐ and Extra‐Indian Admixture and Genetic Diversity in Reunion Island Revealed by Analysis of Mitochondrial DNA. Annals of Human Genetics. 73(3). 314–334. 13 indexed citations
18.
Saut, Noémie, Guy Longepied, P. Terriou, et al.. (2004). Sequence family variant loss from the AZFc interval of the human Y chromosome, but not gene copy loss, is strongly associated with male infertility. Journal of Medical Genetics. 41(11). 814–825. 118 indexed citations
19.
Pont, Françoise Le, Nicolas Pech, & Pierre‐Yves Boëlle. (2003). A New Scale for Measuring Dynamic Patterns of Sexual Partnership and Concurrency. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 30(1). 6–9. 19 indexed citations
20.
Pech, Nicolas. (1997). Use of Principal Component Analysis with Instrumental Variables (PCAIV) to analyse fisheries catch data. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 54(1). 32–47. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026