Nico Cellinese

2.8k total citations
56 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Nico Cellinese is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Nico Cellinese has authored 56 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 36 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 29 papers in Molecular Biology and 21 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Nico Cellinese's work include Plant Diversity and Evolution (33 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (19 papers) and Plant and animal studies (11 papers). Nico Cellinese is often cited by papers focused on Plant Diversity and Evolution (33 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (19 papers) and Plant and animal studies (11 papers). Nico Cellinese collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Greece. Nico Cellinese's co-authors include Reed S. Beaman, Robert Guralnick, Jan Salick, Sandra Knapp, Andrew A. Crowl, Ryan A. Folk, Rosemarie C. Haberle, Pamela S. Soltis, Roderic Page and Cynthia Parr and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Nico Cellinese

51 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Nico Cellinese United States 21 694 508 506 229 222 56 1.4k
Austin Mast United States 23 1.1k 1.6× 605 1.2× 526 1.0× 278 1.2× 368 1.7× 41 1.8k
Ryan A. Folk United States 22 983 1.4× 835 1.6× 518 1.0× 189 0.8× 486 2.2× 76 1.7k
Peter B. Heenan New Zealand 23 1.3k 1.8× 720 1.4× 1.1k 2.1× 217 0.9× 414 1.9× 160 2.2k
Alexander S. T. Papadopulos United Kingdom 19 505 0.7× 345 0.7× 319 0.6× 89 0.4× 496 2.2× 39 1.1k
Renske E. Onstein Germany 25 1.0k 1.5× 387 0.8× 387 0.8× 253 1.1× 334 1.5× 52 1.6k
Aelys M. Humphreys Sweden 19 816 1.2× 334 0.7× 428 0.8× 232 1.0× 253 1.1× 35 1.4k
Oscar A. Pérez‐Escobar United Kingdom 19 824 1.2× 401 0.8× 385 0.8× 94 0.4× 199 0.9× 65 1.1k
Christopher J. Grassa United States 17 278 0.4× 405 0.8× 391 0.8× 145 0.6× 413 1.9× 25 1.1k
Laura Parducci Sweden 20 259 0.4× 377 0.7× 234 0.5× 137 0.6× 397 1.8× 38 1.3k
David H. Hembry United States 17 637 0.9× 125 0.2× 307 0.6× 109 0.5× 214 1.0× 26 954

Countries citing papers authored by Nico Cellinese

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nico Cellinese's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nico Cellinese with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nico Cellinese more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nico Cellinese

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nico Cellinese. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nico Cellinese. The network helps show where Nico Cellinese may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nico Cellinese

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nico Cellinese. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nico Cellinese based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nico Cellinese. Nico Cellinese is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Crowl, Andrew A., James L. Luteyn, Walter S. Judd, et al.. (2024). A global blueberry phylogeny: Evolution, diversification, and biogeography of Vaccinieae (Ericaceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 201. 108202–108202. 2 indexed citations
3.
Zuntini, Alexandre R., et al.. (2023). From southern Africa and beyond: Historical biogeography of a monocotyledonous bulbous geophyte. Journal of Biogeography. 50(9). 1623–1638. 3 indexed citations
4.
Cantino, Philip D., Kevin de Queiroz, & Nico Cellinese. (2023). A Brief Guide to Establishing Phylogenetically Defined Names under the International Code of Phylogenetic Nomenclature (PhyloCode). 1(2). 1 indexed citations
5.
Crowl, Andrew A., et al.. (2022). Peeling back the layers: First phylogenomic insights into the Ledebouriinae (Scilloideae, Asparagaceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 169. 107430–107430. 7 indexed citations
6.
Tribble, Carrie M., et al.. (2021). 1, 2, 3, GO! Venture beyond gene ontologies in plant evolutionary research. American Journal of Botany. 108(3). 361–365. 4 indexed citations
7.
Cordeiro, Inês, et al.. (2020). Biogeography of succulent spurges from Brazilian Seasonally Dry Tropical Forest (SDTF). Taxon. 70(1). 153–169. 4 indexed citations
8.
Folk, Ryan A., Marcelo Reginato, Fabián A. Michelangeli, et al.. (2020). A two‐tier bioinformatic pipeline to develop probes for target capture of nuclear loci with applications in Melastomataceae. Applications in Plant Sciences. 8(5). 24 indexed citations
9.
Folk, Ryan A., Mark E. Mort, Nico Cellinese, et al.. (2019). Rates of niche and phenotype evolution lag behind diversification in a temperate radiation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 116(22). 10874–10882. 107 indexed citations
10.
Landis, Jacob B., et al.. (2019). Geophytism in monocots leads to higher rates of diversification. New Phytologist. 225(2). 1023–1032. 21 indexed citations
11.
Folk, Ryan A., et al.. (2018). Pseudo-parallel patterns of disjunctions in an Arctic-alpine plant lineage. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 123. 88–100. 20 indexed citations
12.
Guralnick, Robert, Nico Cellinese, John Deck, et al.. (2015). Community Next Steps for Making Globally Unique Identifiers Work for Biocollections Data. ZooKeys. 494(494). 133–154. 39 indexed citations
13.
Crowl, Andrew A., Evgeny V. Mavrodiev, Guilhem Mansion, et al.. (2014). Phylogeny of Campanuloideae (Campanulaceae) with Emphasis on the Utility of Nuclear Pentatricopeptide Repeat (PPR) Genes. PLoS ONE. 9(4). e94199–e94199. 42 indexed citations
14.
Stucky, Brian J., et al.. (2014). The BiSciCol Triplifier: bringing biodiversity data to the Semantic Web. BMC Bioinformatics. 15(1). 257–257. 8 indexed citations
15.
Peruzzi, Lorenzo, et al.. (2013). <i>Campanula martinii</i> (Campanulaceae), a new species from northern Italy. Phytotaxa. 111(1). 27–27. 5 indexed citations
16.
Mansion, Guilhem, Gerald Parolly, Andrew A. Crowl, et al.. (2012). How to Handle Speciose Clades? Mass Taxon-Sampling as a Strategy towards Illuminating the Natural History of Campanula (Campanuloideae). PLoS ONE. 7(11). e50076–e50076. 78 indexed citations
17.
18.
Beaman, Reed S., et al.. (2012). TOLKIN – Tree of Life Knowledge and Information Network: Filling a Gap for Collaborative Research in Biological Systematics. PLoS ONE. 7(6). e39352–e39352. 4 indexed citations
19.
Parr, Cynthia, Robert Guralnick, Nico Cellinese, & Roderic Page. (2011). Evolutionary informatics: unifying knowledge about the diversity of life. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 27(2). 94–103. 91 indexed citations
20.
Cellinese, Nico. (2002). Revision on the genus Phyllagathis (Melastomataceae: Sonerileae). I. The species in Burma, Thailand, Peninsular Malaysia and Sumatra. Blumea - Biodiversity Evolution and Biogeography of Plants. 47(3). 463–492. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026