Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Distributed fiber‐optic temperature sensing for hydrologic systems
2006477 citationsJ. S. Selker, W. M. J. Luxemburg et al.profile →
Earth's surface water change over the past 30 years
2016329 citationsFedor Baart, Hessel Winsemius et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Nick van de Giesen
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Nick van de Giesen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nick van de Giesen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nick van de Giesen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nick van de Giesen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nick van de Giesen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nick van de Giesen. The network helps show where Nick van de Giesen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nick van de Giesen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nick van de Giesen.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nick van de Giesen based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Nick van de Giesen. Nick van de Giesen is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Giesen, Nick van de, Frank Annor, Rébecca Hochreutener, & J. S. Selker. (2019). The first five years of the Trans-African Hydro-Meteorological observatory (TAHMO): From nice idea to a network of 500+ stations. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2019.2 indexed citations
11.
Hut, Rolf, Nick van de Giesen, & Niels Drost. (2018). The future of global is local. eWaterCycle II: bridging the gap between catchment hydrologists and global hydrologists.. EGUGA. 10614.1 indexed citations
Hoogeveen, J., et al.. (2015). GlobWat – a global water balance model to assess water use in irrigated agriculture (discussion paper). Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).1 indexed citations
Giesen, Nick van de, Rolf Hut, M. Andreini, & J. S. Selker. (2013). Trans-African Hydro-Meteorological Observatory (TAHMO): A network to monitor weather, water, and climate in Africa. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2013.4 indexed citations
17.
Raso, Luciano, Dirk Schwanenberg, & Nick van de Giesen. (2012). Tree Structure Generation from Ensemble Forecasts for Short-Term Reservoir Optimization. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2012.1 indexed citations
18.
Giesen, Nick van de, Jens Liebe, & Gerlinde Jung. (2010). Adapting to climate change in the Volta Basin, West Africa.. Current Science. 98(8). 1033–1037.73 indexed citations
19.
Giesen, Nick van de, et al.. (2009). Affordable Acoustic Disdrometer: Design, Calibration, Tests. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2009.1 indexed citations
20.
Giesen, Nick van de, et al.. (2002). Long-Term Water Balance of the Volta River Basin in West Africa. AGUFM. 2002.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.