Nicholas Pomato

22 total papers · 412 total citations
13 papers, 321 citations indexed

About

Nicholas Pomato is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Molecular Biology and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Nicholas Pomato has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 321 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 6 papers in Molecular Biology and 6 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Nicholas Pomato's work include Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (7 papers), Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (5 papers) and Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (4 papers). Nicholas Pomato is often cited by papers focused on Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (7 papers), Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (5 papers) and Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (4 papers). Nicholas Pomato collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Germany. Nicholas Pomato's co-authors include Richard P. McCabe, Michael G. Hanna, Martin V. Haspel, Leona C. Peters, Herbert Hoover, Janet H. Ransom, M. G. Hanna, Charles H. Evans, Jeffrey A. Heinbaugh and Reinhard Bredehorst and has published in prestigious journals such as Analytical Biochemistry, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences and International Journal of Cancer.

In The Last Decade

Nicholas Pomato

13 papers receiving 292 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Nicholas Pomato	171	157	123	88	33	13	321
Aniruddha Gangopadhyay	126 0.7×	181 1.2×	92 0.7×	117 1.3×	20 0.6×	16	334
Gadi Gazit Bornstein	188 1.1×	150 1.0×	104 0.8×	101 1.1×	13 0.4×	9	334
Primus Fj	266 1.6×	106 0.7×	42 0.3×	103 1.2×	26 0.8×	10	350
Laura Cons	106 0.6×	150 1.0×	183 1.5×	78 0.9×	13 0.4×	12	351
L D Apelgren	158 0.9×	167 1.1×	100 0.8×	132 1.5×	31 0.9×	11	333
IFC McKenzie	176 1.0×	201 1.3×	166 1.3×	100 1.1×	20 0.6×	15	351
Tessa M. Bradford	176 1.0×	190 1.2×	119 1.0×	56 0.6×	10 0.3×	11	341
Petra Lutterbuese	201 1.2×	108 0.7×	131 1.1×	220 2.5×	11 0.3×	12	329
Nicolle H. Rekers	93 0.5×	81 0.5×	169 1.4×	220 2.5×	25 0.8×	12	363
Jacqueline Mock	117 0.7×	91 0.6×	84 0.7×	217 2.5×	50 1.5×	18	295

Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas Pomato

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas Pomato's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas Pomato with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas Pomato more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas Pomato

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas Pomato. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas Pomato. The network helps show where Nicholas Pomato may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicholas Pomato

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicholas Pomato. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicholas Pomato based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicholas Pomato. Nicholas Pomato is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact