Nicholas Oliver

784 total citations
10 papers, 605 citations indexed

About

Nicholas Oliver is a scholar working on Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychiatry and Mental health. According to data from OpenAlex, Nicholas Oliver has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 605 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Neurology, 6 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 2 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health. Recurrent topics in Nicholas Oliver's work include Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (6 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (5 papers) and Coastal and Marine Dynamics (2 papers). Nicholas Oliver is often cited by papers focused on Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (6 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (5 papers) and Coastal and Marine Dynamics (2 papers). Nicholas Oliver collaborates with scholars based in United States and China. Nicholas Oliver's co-authors include Mark S. George, Ziad Nahas, Monica Molloy, George W. Arana, S. Craig Risch, Andrew M. Speer, Xingbao Li, John G. Keilp, Sarah H. Lisanby and Tal Burt and has published in prestigious journals such as Biological Psychiatry, Bipolar Disorders and Current Psychiatry Reports.

In The Last Decade

Nicholas Oliver

10 papers receiving 577 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Nicholas Oliver United States 7 479 275 156 124 115 10 605
Demétrio Ortega Rumi Brazil 8 477 1.0× 215 0.8× 230 1.5× 140 1.1× 116 1.0× 14 626
Marina O. Rosa Brazil 8 382 0.8× 160 0.6× 208 1.3× 123 1.0× 83 0.7× 19 517
Alexander Mishory United States 11 285 0.6× 401 1.5× 237 1.5× 54 0.4× 65 0.6× 13 860
Alessandra Baccaro Brazil 7 453 0.9× 240 0.9× 200 1.3× 71 0.6× 60 0.5× 8 553
Marco Antônio Marcolin Brazil 13 599 1.3× 281 1.0× 163 1.0× 176 1.4× 139 1.2× 28 783
Bernardo Sampaio-Júnior Brazil 12 580 1.2× 316 1.1× 281 1.8× 86 0.7× 67 0.6× 14 767
Peter Bulow United States 6 746 1.6× 441 1.6× 305 2.0× 134 1.1× 175 1.5× 6 902
Janaina Farias de Oliveira Brazil 7 697 1.5× 418 1.5× 266 1.7× 85 0.7× 84 0.7× 8 773
Laura Tadini Italy 11 636 1.3× 439 1.6× 272 1.7× 88 0.7× 67 0.6× 14 864
Romain Duprat Belgium 16 570 1.2× 596 2.2× 171 1.1× 102 0.8× 87 0.8× 32 920

Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas Oliver

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas Oliver's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas Oliver with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas Oliver more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas Oliver

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas Oliver. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas Oliver. The network helps show where Nicholas Oliver may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicholas Oliver

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicholas Oliver. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicholas Oliver based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicholas Oliver. Nicholas Oliver is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Sackeïm, Harold A., John G. Keilp, A. John Rush, et al.. (2001). The effects of vagus nerve stimulation on cognitive performance in patients with treatment-resistant depression.. PubMed. 14(1). 53–62. 130 indexed citations
2.
Nahas, Ziad, Xingbao Li, Jeong‐Ho Chae, et al.. (2001). What Does ECS Stand for? Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Depression. Epilepsy & Behavior. 2(3). S21–S29. 3 indexed citations
3.
George, Mark S., F.R. Sallee, Ziad Nahas, Nicholas Oliver, & Eric M. Wassermann. (2001). Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) as a research tool in Tourette syndrome and related disorders.. PubMed. 85. 225–35. 19 indexed citations
4.
George, Mark S., Ziad Nahas, Monica Molloy, et al.. (2000). A controlled trial of daily left prefrontal cortex TMS for treating depression. Biological Psychiatry. 48(10). 962–970. 358 indexed citations
5.
Nahas, Ziad, Nicholas Oliver, Michael R. Johnson, et al.. (2000). 515. Feasibility and efficacy of left prefrontal rTMS as a maintenance antidepressant. Biological Psychiatry. 47(8). S156–S157. 5 indexed citations
6.
George, Mark S., et al.. (1999). Improvement of depression following transcranial magnetic stimulation. Current Psychiatry Reports. 1(2). 114–124. 33 indexed citations
7.
Nahas, Ziad, Monica Molloy, Nicholas Oliver, et al.. (1999). Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: perspectives for application in the treatment of bipolar and unipolar disorders. Bipolar Disorders. 1(2). 73–80. 26 indexed citations
8.
George, Mark S., David Avery, Ziad Nahas, et al.. (1999). rTMS studies of mood and emotion.. PubMed. 51. 304–14. 22 indexed citations
9.
Soulsby, R.L., et al.. (1989). Field measurements of sediment suspension above bedforms in a sandy estuary. EPrints - HR Wallingford (HR Wallingford). 8 indexed citations
10.
Southgate, H.N. & Nicholas Oliver. (1989). Efficient solution to the current-depth dispersion equation. EPrints - HR Wallingford (HR Wallingford). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026