Nicholas DiRienzo

714 total citations
27 papers, 506 citations indexed

About

Nicholas DiRienzo is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Nicholas DiRienzo has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 506 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 20 papers in Genetics and 5 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Nicholas DiRienzo's work include Animal Behavior and Reproduction (25 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (18 papers) and Plant and animal studies (16 papers). Nicholas DiRienzo is often cited by papers focused on Animal Behavior and Reproduction (25 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (18 papers) and Plant and animal studies (16 papers). Nicholas DiRienzo collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Finland. Nicholas DiRienzo's co-authors include Ann V. Hedrick, Pierre‐Olivier Montiglio, Jonathan N. Pruitt, Petri T. Niemelä, Anna Dornhaus, Hitoshi Aonuma, Raine Kortet, Anssi Vainikka, Jeremy L. Marshall and Jason Chen and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and Journal of Animal Ecology.

In The Last Decade

Nicholas DiRienzo

27 papers receiving 498 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Nicholas DiRienzo United States 13 454 260 90 60 56 27 506
Chang S. Han South Korea 15 469 1.0× 242 0.9× 80 0.9× 26 0.4× 80 1.4× 40 550
Chad D. Hoefler United States 12 367 0.8× 253 1.0× 65 0.7× 73 1.2× 40 0.7× 15 428
Darren Rebar United States 16 567 1.2× 342 1.3× 71 0.8× 24 0.4× 111 2.0× 30 684
Michael R. Maxwell United States 13 422 0.9× 302 1.2× 127 1.4× 43 0.7× 103 1.8× 23 540
Katherine L. Barry Australia 15 708 1.6× 498 1.9× 67 0.7× 89 1.5× 109 1.9× 34 795
Kevin A. Judge Canada 13 386 0.9× 201 0.8× 79 0.9× 23 0.4× 78 1.4× 24 476
Eira Ihalainen Finland 9 482 1.1× 208 0.8× 70 0.8× 47 0.8× 77 1.4× 12 531
James C. O’Hanlon Australia 13 375 0.8× 214 0.8× 53 0.6× 47 0.8× 52 0.9× 32 452
Malcolm F. Rosenthal United States 13 389 0.9× 222 0.9× 73 0.8× 63 1.1× 144 2.6× 21 488
Matthias W. Foellmer United States 11 544 1.2× 444 1.7× 127 1.4× 69 1.1× 115 2.1× 20 649

Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas DiRienzo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas DiRienzo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas DiRienzo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas DiRienzo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas DiRienzo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas DiRienzo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas DiRienzo. The network helps show where Nicholas DiRienzo may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicholas DiRienzo

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicholas DiRienzo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicholas DiRienzo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicholas DiRienzo. Nicholas DiRienzo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
DiRienzo, Nicholas, et al.. (2022). Injected serotonin decreases foraging aggression in black widow spiders (Latrodectus hesperus), but dopamine has no effect. Behavioural Processes. 204. 104802–104802. 3 indexed citations
2.
DiRienzo, Nicholas, et al.. (2020). Foraging behavior and extended phenotype independently affect foraging success in spiders. Behavioral Ecology. 31(5). 1242–1249. 5 indexed citations
3.
DiRienzo, Nicholas, et al.. (2019). Data from: Game of webs: species and web structure influence contest outcome in black widow spiders. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 1 indexed citations
4.
DiRienzo, Nicholas, et al.. (2019). Correction to: Bringing down the house: male widow spiders reduce the webs of aggressive females more. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 73(2). 1 indexed citations
5.
DiRienzo, Nicholas & Hitoshi Aonuma. (2018). Plasticity in extended phenotype increases offspring defence despite individual variation in web structure and behaviour. Animal Behaviour. 138. 9–17. 19 indexed citations
6.
DiRienzo, Nicholas, et al.. (2018). Data from: Bringing down the house: male widow spiders reduce the webs of aggressive females more. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 1 indexed citations
7.
DiRienzo, Nicholas, J. Chadwick Johnson, & Anna Dornhaus. (2018). Juvenile social experience generates differences in behavioral variation but not averages. Behavioral Ecology. 30(2). 455–464. 12 indexed citations
8.
DiRienzo, Nicholas, et al.. (2018). Bringing down the house: male widow spiders reduce the webs of aggressive females more. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 73(2). 11 indexed citations
9.
DiRienzo, Nicholas & Anna Dornhaus. (2017). Temnothorax rugatulus ant colonies consistently vary in nest structure across time and context. PLoS ONE. 12(6). e0177598–e0177598. 16 indexed citations
10.
DiRienzo, Nicholas & Pierre‐Olivier Montiglio. (2016). Linking consistent individual differences in web structure and behavior in black widow spiders. Behavioral Ecology. 27(5). 1424–1431. 23 indexed citations
11.
DiRienzo, Nicholas, Petri T. Niemelä, Ann V. Hedrick, & Raine Kortet. (2016). Adult bacterial exposure increases behavioral variation and drives higher repeatability in field crickets. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 70(11). 1941–1947. 21 indexed citations
12.
DiRienzo, Nicholas & Pierre‐Olivier Montiglio. (2015). Four ways in which data-free papers on animal personality fail to be impactful. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 3. 10 indexed citations
13.
14.
DiRienzo, Nicholas, et al.. (2015). Juvenile pathogen exposure affects the presence of personality in adult field crickets. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 3. 32 indexed citations
15.
DiRienzo, Nicholas & Ann V. Hedrick. (2014). Animal personalities and their implications for complex signaling. Current Zoology. 60(3). 381–386. 8 indexed citations
16.
DiRienzo, Nicholas, Jonathan N. Pruitt, & Ann V. Hedrick. (2013). The combined behavioural tendencies of predator and prey mediate the outcome of their interaction. Animal Behaviour. 86(2). 317–322. 52 indexed citations
17.
Cotter, Patrick R., et al.. (2013). Assessing the Effects of Rearing Environment, Natural Selection, and Developmental Stage on the Emergence of a Behavioral Syndrome. Ethology. 119(5). 436–447. 47 indexed citations
19.
Niemelä, Petri T., Nicholas DiRienzo, & Ann V. Hedrick. (2012). Predator-induced changes in the boldness of naïve field crickets, Gryllus integer, depends on behavioural type. Animal Behaviour. 84(1). 129–135. 58 indexed citations
20.
DiRienzo, Nicholas & Jeremy L. Marshall. (2012). Function of the Hemolymph Nuptial Gift in the Ground Cricket, Allonemobius socius. Ethology. 119(2). 104–109. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026