Nicholas DeVito
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty top 1%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Ben GoldacreSeb BaconGeorgia C. RichardsJessica FlemingerCarl HeneghanHelen J CurtisSusan ChimonasLisa French
- Topics
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (17 papers)Ethics in Clinical Research (9 papers)Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (8 papers)
- Journals
- NatureThe LancetJAMA
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Nicholas DeVito
32 papers receiving 636 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 264
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 217
- Economics and Econometrics 181
- General Health Professions 92
- Pharmacology 80
Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas DeVito
This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas DeVito's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas DeVito with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas DeVito more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas DeVito
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas DeVito. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas DeVito. The network helps show where Nicholas DeVito may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicholas DeVito
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicholas DeVito. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicholas DeVito based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicholas DeVito. Nicholas DeVito is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 11 | |
| 18 | 155 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 132 |
About Nicholas DeVito
Nicholas DeVito is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Information Systems and Management and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 33 papers that have together received 661 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (17 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (9 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (217 citations), Health Informatics (13 citations) and Pharmacology (80 citations). Nicholas DeVito has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ben Goldacre, Seb Bacon, Georgia C. Richards, Jessica Fleminger, Carl Heneghan, Helen J Curtis, Susan Chimonas, Lisa French, David J. Rothman and Tanja Rombey. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, The Lancet and JAMA.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.