This map shows the geographic impact of Nicaragua's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicaragua with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicaragua more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicaragua. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicaragua. The network helps show where Nicaragua may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicaragua
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicaragua.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicaragua based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Nicaragua. Nicaragua is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Myanmar, et al.. (2021). Countering the use of information and communications technologies for criminal purposes.4 indexed citations
2.
Azerbaijan, Cameroon, Guatemala, et al.. (2021). Promoting a culture of peace and tolerance to safeguard religious sites.1 indexed citations
3.
Cuba, Kazakhstan, Myanmar, et al.. (2020). Proposed programme budget for 2021.3 indexed citations
4.
Austria, Chile Chile, Cuba, et al.. (2020). Promotion of the enjoyment of the cultural rights of everyone and respect for cultural diversity.1 indexed citations
5.
Angola, Antigua, Cuba, et al.. (2020). Comprehensive and coordinated response to the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic :.3 indexed citations
6.
Algeria, Bolívia, Cuba, et al.. (2018). United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Peasants and Other People Working in Rural Areas.7 indexed citations
7.
Angola, Antigua, Barbuda, et al.. (2016). United Nations Decade of Action on Nutrition (2016-2025) :.65 indexed citations
8.
Bolívia, Cuba, Ecuador, et al.. (2016). Declaration on the Right to Peace.2 indexed citations
9.
Azerbaijan, Bolívia, Cuba, et al.. (2015). Ensuring use of remotely piloted aircraft or armed drones in counter-terrorism and military operations in accordance with international law, including international human rights and humanitarian law :.1 indexed citations
10.
Bolívia, Cuba, Ecuador, Nicaragua, & Venezuela. (2014). Use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination :.2 indexed citations
11.
Bangladesh, Bolívia, Myanmar, et al.. (2013). Promotion of a democratic and equitable international order.5 indexed citations
12.
Algeria, Bangladesh, Bolívia, et al.. (2011). Mandate of the Independent Expert on Human Rights and International Solidarity.1 indexed citations
13.
Argentina, Bolívia, Egypt, et al.. (2010). Additional views on which the Chair may draw in preparing text to facilitate negotiations among Parties.2 indexed citations
14.
Nicaragua, et al.. (2008). Emergency Obstetric Care in Nicaragua: A 2005/6 National Level Assessment and Assessment of a MOH/UNFPA/AMDD Project in three SILAIS (2002-2005)..2 indexed citations
15.
Honduras & Nicaragua. (2006). Honduras y Nicaragua - Proyecto Reserva de Biosfera Transfronteriza Corazon del Corredor Biologico Mesoamericano : plan de desarrollo para los pueblos indigenas - anexo 14 - consultas con actores involucrados (stakeholders). 1–38.1 indexed citations
16.
Nicaragua. (1987). Constitución Política de la República de Nicaragua, 1987. Medical Entomology and Zoology.5 indexed citations
17.
Nicaragua. (1978). Programa de descentralización y desarrollo de la región del Pacífico. Medical Entomology and Zoology.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.