Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The origin of saline formation waters: 1. Isotopic composition
1966385 citationsRobert N. Clayton, I. Friedman et al.Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheresprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of N.F. Shimp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N.F. Shimp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N.F. Shimp more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by N.F. Shimp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N.F. Shimp. The network helps show where N.F. Shimp may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of N.F. Shimp
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of N.F. Shimp.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of N.F. Shimp based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with N.F. Shimp. N.F. Shimp is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Shimp, N.F., et al.. (2018). Sulfur reduction of Illinois coals : washability studies.
2.
Gluskoter, H.J., et al.. (2018). Occurrence and Distribution of Potentially Volatile Trace Elements in Coal: A Final Report.2 indexed citations
3.
Frye, John C. & N.F. Shimp. (2018). Major, Minor, and Trace Elements in Sediments of Late Pleistocene Lake Saline Compared With Those in Lake Michigan Sediments.
4.
Roy, William R., et al.. (2017). Geochemical Properties of Coal Wastes and the Toxicological Effects on Aquatic Life.
5.
Cahill, Ronan A., et al.. (1982). Forms and volatilities of trace and minor elements in coal. 102.2 indexed citations
6.
Shimp, N.F., et al.. (1981). Removal of organic sulfur by low-temperature carbonization of Illinois coals. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 7.1 indexed citations
7.
Shimp, N.F., et al.. (1980). Geologic and geochemical studies of the New Albany shale group (Devonian-Mississippian) in Illinois : final report, June 30, 1980.1 indexed citations
Griffin, Robert A., Keros Cartwright, N.F. Shimp, et al.. (1976). Attenuation of pollutants in municipal landfill leachate by clay minerals: Part 1, Column leaching and field variations.2 indexed citations
Shimp, N.F., Harry V. Leland, & W.A. White. (1970). Distribution of major, minor, and trace constituents in unconsolidated sediments from southern Lake Michigan.19 indexed citations
Clayton, Robert N., I. Friedman, Donald L. Graf, et al.. (1966). The origin of saline formation waters: 1. Isotopic composition. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 71(16). 3869–3882.385 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.