Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Reducing Delirium After Hip Fracture: A Randomized Trial
2001972 citationsNeil M. Resnick et al.Journal of the American Geriatrics Societyprofile →
Delirium Is Independently Associated with Poor Functional Recovery After Hip Fracture
2000530 citationsNeil M. Resnick et al.Journal of the American Geriatrics Societyprofile →
Platelet-derived growth factor B chain promoter contains a cis-acting fluid shear-stress-responsive element.
Countries citing papers authored by Neil M. Resnick
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Neil M. Resnick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neil M. Resnick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neil M. Resnick more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neil M. Resnick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neil M. Resnick. The network helps show where Neil M. Resnick may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Neil M. Resnick
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Neil M. Resnick.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Neil M. Resnick based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Neil M. Resnick. Neil M. Resnick is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Resnick, Neil M., et al.. (2013). Brain mechanisms underlying behavioral therapy for urgency incontinence in older women. Neurourology and Urodynamics.1 indexed citations
7.
Schaefer, Werner, Becky Clarkson, Staša Tadić, Neil M. Resnick, & Derek Griffiths. (2012). The Urodynamics of Overactive Bladder and Urge Incontinence: Does Standard Urodynamics Miss Essential Details?. Neurourology and Urodynamics.1 indexed citations
8.
Clarkson, Becky, et al.. (2012). Do Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) and functional MRI agree when investigating brain control of the lower urinary tract. Neurourology and Urodynamics.3 indexed citations
9.
Clarkson, Becky, et al.. (2011). Exploring the potential of neuroimaging using near infrared spectroscopy during complex clinical urodynamics. Neurourology and Urodynamics.
10.
Tadić, Staša, et al.. (2010). Structural damage of brain’s white matter affects brain-bladder control in older women with urgency incontinence. Neurourology and Urodynamics.2 indexed citations
11.
Tadić, Staša, et al.. (2009). Brain activity measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is related to patient reports and clinical severity of urge urinary incontinence. Neurourology and Urodynamics.3 indexed citations
12.
Schaefer, Werner, et al.. (2009). Urodynamic Grading of Bladder Outflow Conditions in Females. Neurourology and Urodynamics.3 indexed citations
Greenspan, Susan L., Joel B. Nelson, Donald L. Trump, & Neil M. Resnick. (2007). Effect of Once-Weekly Oral Alendronate on Bone Loss in Men Receiving Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Cancer. Annals of Internal Medicine.19 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.