Neil H. Thomas

1.1k total citations
10 papers, 628 citations indexed

About

Neil H. Thomas is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Neil H. Thomas has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 628 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Molecular Biology, 5 papers in Genetics and 2 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Neil H. Thomas's work include RNA modifications and cancer (5 papers), Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research (5 papers) and RNA Research and Splicing (4 papers). Neil H. Thomas is often cited by papers focused on RNA modifications and cancer (5 papers), Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research (5 papers) and RNA Research and Splicing (4 papers). Neil H. Thomas collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Neil H. Thomas's co-authors include Victor Dubowitz, Marjo S. van der Knaap, Steven N. Breiter, James M. Powers, Hans Stroink, Rudy Van Coster, Jacob Valk, Sakkubai Naidu, Susan Blasér and P. G. Barth and has published in prestigious journals such as Neurology, Annals of Neurology and American Journal of Neuroradiology.

In The Last Decade

Neil H. Thomas

10 papers receiving 610 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Neil H. Thomas United Kingdom	7	527	242	123	65	46	10	628
Yalda Nilipour Iran	12	219 0.4×	70 0.3×	53 0.4×	40 0.6×	19 0.4×	61	426
Jeffrey B. Sherman United States	8	128 0.2×	33 0.1×	49 0.4×	66 1.0×	49 1.1×	9	446
A.‐R. Moslemi Sweden	10	335 0.6×	30 0.1×	19 0.2×	128 2.0×	34 0.7×	15	446
Christine A. Oley Australia	9	205 0.4×	80 0.3×	55 0.4×	56 0.9×	2 0.0×	10	416
Tahir Naeem Khan Pakistan	11	118 0.2×	47 0.2×	26 0.2×	10 0.2×	30 0.7×	32	308
Tingjun Dai China	13	194 0.4×	41 0.2×	14 0.1×	82 1.3×	55 1.2×	39	427
Magdalena Badura‐Stronka Poland	12	183 0.3×	23 0.1×	77 0.6×	20 0.3×	15 0.3×	32	357
Fong Ct United States	6	141 0.3×	21 0.1×	28 0.2×	38 0.6×	19 0.4×	186	296
Xiomara Q. Rosales United States	10	533 1.0×	124 0.5×	56 0.5×	22 0.3×	12 0.3×	17	653
Kristbjorn O. Gudmundsson United States	13	195 0.4×	66 0.3×	28 0.2×	7 0.1×	51 1.1×	23	400

Countries citing papers authored by Neil H. Thomas

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Neil H. Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neil H. Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neil H. Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Neil H. Thomas

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neil H. Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neil H. Thomas. The network helps show where Neil H. Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Neil H. Thomas

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Neil H. Thomas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Neil H. Thomas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Neil H. Thomas. Neil H. Thomas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Knaap, Marjo S. van der, Gajja S. Salomons, Rong Li, et al.. (2005). Unusual variants of Alexander's disease. Annals of Neurology. 57(3). 327–338. 91 indexed citations

2.

Thomas, Neil H.. (2005). Diagnosis and management of Guillain–Barré syndrome. Current Paediatrics. 15(4). 287–291. 5 indexed citations

3.

Knaap, Marjo S. van der, Sakkubai Naidu, Steven N. Breiter, et al.. (2001). Alexander disease: diagnosis with MR imaging.. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 22(3). 541–52. 227 indexed citations

4.

Thomas, Neil H.. (1999). The muscular dystrophies. European Journal of Paediatric Neurology. 3(3). 137–139. 1 indexed citations

5.

Taylor, Joanne, Neil H. Thomas, Cathryn M. Lewis, et al.. (1998). Correlation of SMNt and SMNc gene copy number with age of onset and survival in spinal muscular atrophy. European Journal of Human Genetics. 6(5). 467–474. 94 indexed citations

6.

Chalmers, R. M., Phillipa J. Lamont, Isabelle Nelson, et al.. (1997). A mitochondrial DNA tRNA ^Val point mutation associated with adult-onset Leigh syndrome. Neurology. 49(2). 589–592. 55 indexed citations

7.

Thomas, Neil H. & Victor Dubowitz. (1994). The natural history of type I (severe) spinal muscular atrophy. Neuromuscular Disorders. 4(5-6). 497–502. 84 indexed citations

8.

Daniels, R.J., Neil H. Thomas, Ruth N. MacKinnon, et al.. (1992). Linkage analysis of spinal muscular atrophy. Genomics. 12(2). 335–339. 28 indexed citations

9.

Daniels, R.J., G K Suthers, Karen Morrison, et al.. (1992). Prenatal prediction of spinal muscular atrophy.. Journal of Medical Genetics. 29(3). 165–170. 39 indexed citations

10.

Davies, Kay E., Neil H. Thomas, R.J. Daniels, & Victor Dubowitz. (1991). Molecular studies of spinal muscular atrophy. Neuromuscular Disorders. 1(2). 83–85. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact