Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Energy- and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: Key issues, ranges and recommendations
2009677 citationsFrancesco Cherubini, Neil Bird et al.Resources Conservation and Recyclingprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Neil Bird's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neil Bird with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neil Bird more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neil Bird. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neil Bird. The network helps show where Neil Bird may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Neil Bird
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Neil Bird.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Neil Bird based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Neil Bird. Neil Bird is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bird, Neil, Felix Asante, Simon Bawakyillenuo, et al.. (2016). Public spending on climate change in Africa. Experiences from Ethiopia, Ghana, Tanzania and Uganda.. Econstor (Econstor).8 indexed citations
2.
Bird, Neil, et al.. (2013). Climate Finance: Challenges and Responses.1 indexed citations
3.
Jones, Lindsey, et al.. (2013). Uganda national climate change finance analysis.3 indexed citations
4.
Yanda, Pius Z., et al.. (2013). Tanzania National Climate Change Finance Analysis.7 indexed citations
Bird, Neil, Annette Cowie, Francesco Cherubini, & Gerfried Jungmeier. (2011). Using a Life Cycle Assessment Approach to Estimate the Net Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Bioenergy. RUNE (Research UNE).30 indexed citations
Bird, Neil, et al.. (2011). Bioenergy, land use change and climate change mitigation..65 indexed citations
11.
Zanchi, Giuliana, et al.. (2010). The upfront carbon debt of bioenergy. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).40 indexed citations
12.
Cherubini, Francesco, Neil Bird, Annette Cowie, et al.. (2009). Energy- and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: Key issues, ranges and recommendations. Resources Conservation and Recycling. 53(8). 434–447.677 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Bird, Neil, et al.. (2009). Government institutions, public expenditure and the role of development partners: Meeting Kenya's environmental challenges.1 indexed citations
Brown, David, Kate Schreckenberg, Neil Bird, et al.. (2008). Legal timber: verification and governance in the forest sector. Research Portal (King's College London).39 indexed citations
16.
Lawson, Andrew & Neil Bird. (2008). Government institutions, public expenditure and the role of development partners: meeting the new environmental challenges of the developing world.6 indexed citations
17.
Bird, Neil, et al.. (2008). New Finance for Climate Change and the Environment.26 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.