Neha Midha

422 total citations
24 papers, 262 citations indexed

About

Neha Midha is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Neha Midha has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 262 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Ophthalmology, 14 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 4 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Neha Midha's work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (18 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (10 papers) and Corneal surgery and disorders (7 papers). Neha Midha is often cited by papers focused on Glaucoma and retinal disorders (18 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (10 papers) and Corneal surgery and disorders (7 papers). Neha Midha collaborates with scholars based in India, United States and Switzerland. Neha Midha's co-authors include André Mermoud, Shikha Gupta, Dewang Angmo, Ramanjit Sihota, Varun Gogia, Tanuj Dada, Harsha L. Rao, Kevin Gillmann, Talvir Sidhu and Kaweh Mansouri and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Ophthalmology, British Journal of Ophthalmology and Eye.

In The Last Decade

Neha Midha

24 papers receiving 253 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Neha Midha India 10 225 158 40 32 25 24 262
Luca Scuderi Italy 10 215 1.0× 144 0.9× 52 1.3× 50 1.6× 13 0.5× 22 290
Xiaoqin Yan China 10 288 1.3× 181 1.1× 31 0.8× 45 1.4× 49 2.0× 22 341
Maurizio Digiuni Italy 9 188 0.8× 109 0.7× 40 1.0× 44 1.4× 16 0.6× 14 229
Félix Gil‐Carrasco Mexico 11 221 1.0× 138 0.9× 26 0.7× 32 1.0× 20 0.8× 28 276
Ana Quartilho United Kingdom 9 301 1.3× 235 1.5× 40 1.0× 35 1.1× 18 0.7× 18 359
Alexander Mao Canada 8 216 1.0× 143 0.9× 83 2.1× 37 1.2× 50 2.0× 9 334
Marta Pazos Spain 10 273 1.2× 207 1.3× 36 0.9× 24 0.8× 20 0.8× 36 296
Yinwei Song China 9 274 1.2× 209 1.3× 23 0.6× 35 1.1× 61 2.4× 15 325
Satoshi Kogure Japan 11 239 1.1× 141 0.9× 24 0.6× 55 1.7× 23 0.9× 23 298
Metin Ünlü Türkiye 10 154 0.7× 148 0.9× 92 2.3× 83 2.6× 12 0.5× 32 289

Countries citing papers authored by Neha Midha

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Neha Midha's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neha Midha with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neha Midha more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Neha Midha

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neha Midha. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neha Midha. The network helps show where Neha Midha may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Neha Midha

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Neha Midha. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Neha Midha based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Neha Midha. Neha Midha is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Midha, Neha, Rohit Verma, Vivek Gupta, et al.. (2025). Cognitive Impairment in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma: A Case-Control Study. Journal of Glaucoma. 34(4). 282–289. 1 indexed citations
2.
Midha, Neha, et al.. (2024). Outcomes of bent ab interno needle goniectomy with phacoemulsification in moderate to severe primary open angle glaucoma. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 72(9). 1280–1284. 8 indexed citations
3.
Dada, Tanuj, Neha Midha, Karthikeyan Mahalingam, et al.. (2022). Effect of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction on Intraocular Pressure in Patients With Ocular Hypertension: A Randomized Control Trial. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 239. 66–73. 15 indexed citations
4.
Dada, Tanuj, Neha Midha, Priyanka Chaurasia, et al.. (2020). Effect of Mindfulness Meditation on Intraocular Pressure and Trabecular Meshwork Gene Expression: A Randomized Controlled Trial. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 223. 308–321. 27 indexed citations
6.
Midha, Neha, et al.. (2019). Evaluation of Vision-related Quality of Life in Patients with Glaucoma: A Hospital-based Study. JOURNAL OF CURRENT GLAUCOMA PRACTICE. 13(1). 9–15. 15 indexed citations
7.
Midha, Neha, et al.. (2019). Efficacy of Needling Revision After XEN Gel Stent Implantation: A Prospective Study. Journal of Glaucoma. 29(1). 11–14. 37 indexed citations
8.
Sen, Mrittika, Neha Midha, Talvir Sidhu, et al.. (2018). Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Mitomycin C Combined with Ologen Implant versus Mitomycin C Alone as Adjuvants in Trabeculectomy. Ophthalmology Glaucoma. 1(2). 88–98. 10 indexed citations
9.
Sihota, Ramanjit, Sailesh Kumar, Talvir Sidhu, et al.. (2018). Is combined mechanism glaucoma a distinct entity?. Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 256(10). 1961–1969. 2 indexed citations
10.
Midha, Neha, Harsha L. Rao, André Mermoud, & Kaweh Mansouri. (2018). Identifying the predictors of needling after XEN gel implant. Eye. 33(3). 353–357. 33 indexed citations
11.
Dada, Tanuj, et al.. (2018). New Investigations in Ophthalmology. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. eBooks. 1 indexed citations
12.
Sihota, Ramanjit, Ajay Sharma, Neha Midha, et al.. (2018). ‘Van Herick Plus’: a modified grading scheme for the assessment of peripheral anterior chamber depth and angle. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 103(7). 960–965. 11 indexed citations
13.
Sihota, Ramanjit, Neha Midha, Harathy Selvan, et al.. (2017). Prognosis of different glaucomas seen at a tertiary center: A 10-year overview. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 65(2). 128–128. 6 indexed citations
14.
Kumar, Atul, Neha Midha, Sujata Mohanty, et al.. (2017). Evaluating role of bone marrow-derived stem cells in dry age-related macular degeneration using multifocal electroretinogram and fundus autofluorescence imaging. International Journal of Ophthalmology. 10(10). 1552–1558. 2 indexed citations
15.
Dada, Tanuj, Neha Midha, P Shah, et al.. (2017). Innovations in glaucoma surgery from Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 65(2). 103–103. 6 indexed citations
16.
Khokhar, Sudarshan, et al.. (2017). Unilateral Congenital Cataract: Clinical Profile and Presentation. Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus. 55(2). 107–112. 4 indexed citations
17.
Angmo, Dewang, Tanuj Dada, Neha Midha, & Talvir Sidhu. (2016). Intraoperative optical coherence tomography guided bleb needling. Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research. 11(4). 452–452. 15 indexed citations
18.
Gupta, Shikha, et al.. (2015). Sensitivity of multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) in detecting siderosis. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology. 50(6). 485–490. 3 indexed citations
19.
Khokhar, Sudarshan, et al.. (2015). A Novel Technique to Release Sticking Haptic of a Single-Piece Hydrophobic Acrylic IOL using Irrigation-Aspiration Probe. European Journal of Ophthalmology. 26(3). 281–282. 3 indexed citations
20.
Kumar, Atul, et al.. (2014). Efficacy of Oral Valproic Acid in Patients with Retinitis Pigmentosa. Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 30(7). 580–586. 30 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026