Ned Scott

1.3k total citations · 2 hit papers
7 papers, 837 citations indexed

About

Ned Scott is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Ned Scott has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 837 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Clinical Psychology, 4 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 3 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Ned Scott's work include Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers). Ned Scott is often cited by papers focused on Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers). Ned Scott collaborates with scholars based in Australia and United States. Ned Scott's co-authors include Debra A. Dunstan, Tanya L. Hanstock, Chris Thornton, Todd A. Kahan and Louisa M. Slowiaczek and has published in prestigious journals such as BMC Psychiatry, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology and Depression Research and Treatment.

In The Last Decade

Ned Scott

6 papers receiving 821 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Norms for Zung’s Self-rating Anxiety Scale

2020 333 citations Debra A. Dunstan, Ned Scott BMC Psychiatry profile →
Screening for anxiety and depression: reassessing the utility of the Zung scales

2017 323 citations Debra A. Dunstan, Ned Scott et al. BMC Psychiatry profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Ned Scott Australia	6	278	140	117	114	111	7	837
Rute F. Meneses Portugal	12	236 0.8×	79 0.6×	108 0.9×	197 1.7×	113 1.0×	48	944
Terry D. Schneekloth United States	23	221 0.8×	197 1.4×	91 0.8×	162 1.4×	155 1.4×	70	1.3k
Su‐Ru Chen Taiwan	22	235 0.8×	93 0.7×	119 1.0×	127 1.1×	154 1.4×	62	1.2k
Anna C. Whittaker United Kingdom	20	276 1.0×	133 0.9×	167 1.4×	92 0.8×	196 1.8×	66	1.4k
Pere Roura‐Poch Spain	16	328 1.2×	85 0.6×	178 1.5×	233 2.0×	107 1.0×	52	926
Andrés Heerlein Chile	6	358 1.3×	226 1.6×	121 1.0×	221 1.9×	73 0.7×	13	972
Guy Peryer United Kingdom	16	166 0.6×	61 0.4×	153 1.3×	121 1.1×	164 1.5×	40	803
Josep M. Peri Spain	17	519 1.9×	164 1.2×	108 0.9×	334 2.9×	162 1.5×	49	1.4k
Sara Ahola Kohut Canada	22	418 1.5×	122 0.9×	104 0.9×	132 1.2×	188 1.7×	65	1.9k
Timothy W. Puetz United States	11	201 0.7×	112 0.8×	152 1.3×	187 1.6×	105 0.9×	11	1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Ned Scott

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ned Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ned Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ned Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ned Scott

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ned Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ned Scott. The network helps show where Ned Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ned Scott

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ned Scott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ned Scott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ned Scott. Ned Scott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Dunstan, Debra A. & Ned Scott. (2020). Norms for Zung’s Self-rating Anxiety Scale. BMC Psychiatry. 20(1). 90–90. 333 indexed citations breakdown →

2.

Kahan, Todd A., et al.. (2020). Word frequency does not moderate the degree to which people can selectively attend to parts of visually presented words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 74(3). 573–581.

3.

Dunstan, Debra A. & Ned Scott. (2019). Clarification of the cut-off score for Zung’s self-rating depression scale. BMC Psychiatry. 19(1). 177–177. 115 indexed citations

4.

Dunstan, Debra A. & Ned Scott. (2018). Assigning Clinical Significance and Symptom Severity Using the Zung Scales: Levels of Misclassification Arising from Confusion between Index and Raw Scores. Depression Research and Treatment. 2018. 1–13. 39 indexed citations

5.

Dunstan, Debra A., et al.. (2017). Screening for anxiety and depression: reassessing the utility of the Zung scales. BMC Psychiatry. 17(1). 329–329. 323 indexed citations breakdown →

6.

Scott, Ned, Tanya L. Hanstock, & Chris Thornton. (2014). Dysfunctional self-talk associated with eating disorder severity and symptomatology. Journal of Eating Disorders. 2(1). 14–14. 11 indexed citations

7.

Scott, Ned, et al.. (2013). Using Narrative Therapy to Treat Eating Disorder Not Otherwise Specified. Clinical Case Studies. 12(4). 307–321. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact