Nathan W. Rigel

934 citations
20 papers · 707 indexed · h-index 16
    • Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria 8
    • Vibrio bacteria research studies 3
    • Escherichia coli research studies 3
  • Genetics top 10%
    • Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology 12
    • Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology 5
    • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms 6
    • Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing 4
    • Bacteriophages and microbial interactions 2

Nathan W. Rigel

19 papers receiving 699 citations

Peers

Nathan W. Rigel
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Molecular Medicine 152
  • Endocrinology 97
  • Genetics 301
  • Infectious Diseases 178
  • Molecular Biology 401
Replace Kamakshi Sureka with:
Kamakshi Sureka India
Nicholas N. Nickerson Canada
Emily K. Butler United States
Anne‐Laure Prunier France
Crystal L. Jones United States
Matthias Preuße Germany
Cristina Machón Spain
Garth L. Abrahams South Africa
Jyoti K. Jha United States
Timothy R. Mack United States
Nathan W. Rigel relative to Kamakshi Sureka India Kamakshi Sureka's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Kamakshi Sureka · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan W. Rigel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan W. Rigel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan W. Rigel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan W. Rigel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan W. Rigel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan W. Rigel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan W. Rigel. The network helps show where Nathan W. Rigel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan W. Rigel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan W. Rigel Line = papers co-authored together Nathan W. Rigel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20210
2 20216
3 202021
4 201918
5 201911
6 20191
7 201815
8 201851
9 201515
10 201383
11 201315
12 201265
13 201169
14 200940
15 200921
16 2008101
17 200832
18 200839
19 200864
20 200640

About Nathan W. Rigel

Nathan W. Rigel is a scholar working on Molecular Medicine, Endocrinology and Genetics, having authored 20 papers that have together received 707 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (12 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (8 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (6 papers), Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (5 papers), Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (4 papers), Vibrio bacteria research studies (3 papers), Escherichia coli research studies (3 papers) and Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (152 citations), Endocrinology (97 citations) and Genetics (301 citations). Nathan W. Rigel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Estonia and France. Frequent co-authors include Miriam Braunstein, Thomas J. Silhavy, Dante P. Ricci, Jessica R. McCann, Jon-David Schwalm, Justin A. McDonough, Henry S. Gibbons, Erin McElvania, Sherry L. Kurtz and Dazhong Zhao. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Journal of Bacteriology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026