Nathan Van der Stoep
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Sensory Systems top 2%
- Human-Computer Interaction top 10%
- Co-authors
- Stefan Van der StigchelTanja C.W. NijboerCharles SpenceH. Chris DijkermanDennis HofmanJohanna M. A. Visser‐MeilyRolf A. ZwaanMaarten J. van der Smagt
- Topics
- Multisensory perception and integration (23 papers)Visual perception and processing mechanisms (16 papers)Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Nathan Van der Stoep
32 papers receiving 538 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Cognitive Neuroscience 367
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 325
- Social Psychology 176
- Sensory Systems 157
- Human-Computer Interaction 49
Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Van der Stoep
This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Van der Stoep's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Van der Stoep with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Van der Stoep more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Van der Stoep
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Van der Stoep. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Van der Stoep. The network helps show where Nathan Van der Stoep may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathan Van der Stoep
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathan Van der Stoep. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathan Van der Stoep based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nathan Van der Stoep. Nathan Van der Stoep is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 21 | |
| 11 | 46 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 19 | |
| 15 | 22 | |
| 16 | 46 | |
| 17 | 47 | |
| 18 | 27 | |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Nathan Van der Stoep
Nathan Van der Stoep is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 33 papers that have together received 546 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multisensory perception and integration (23 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (16 papers) and Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (157 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (325 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (367 citations). Nathan Van der Stoep has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Stefan Van der Stigchel, Tanja C.W. Nijboer, Charles Spence, H. Chris Dijkerman, Dennis Hofman, Johanna M. A. Visser‐Meily, Rolf A. Zwaan, Maarten J. van der Smagt, Albert Postma and Jasper H. Fabius. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, PLoS ONE and NeuroImage.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.