Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Unsupervised Pixel-Level Domain Adaptation with Generative Adversarial Networks
2017942 citationsKonstantinos Bousmalis, Nathan Silberman et al.profile →
Indoor scene segmentation using a structured light sensor
2011326 citationsNathan Silberman, Rob Fergusprofile →
Im2Calories: Towards an Automated Mobile Vision Food Diary
2015320 citationsAustin Myers, Nick Johnston et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Silberman
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Silberman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Silberman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Silberman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Silberman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Silberman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Silberman. The network helps show where Nathan Silberman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathan Silberman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathan Silberman.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathan Silberman based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Nathan Silberman. Nathan Silberman is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lovchinsky, Igor, Pouya Samangouei, Ardavan Saeedi, et al.. (2020). Discrepancy Ratio: Evaluating Model Performance When Even Experts Disagree on the Truth. International Conference on Learning Representations.3 indexed citations
Bousmalis, Konstantinos, Nathan Silberman, David Dohan, Dumitru Erhan, & Dilip Krishnan. (2017). Unsupervised Pixel-Level Domain Adaptation with Generative Adversarial Networks. 95–104.942 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Silberman, Nathan. (2017). TF-Slim: A Lightweight Library for Defining, Training and Evaluating Complex Models in TensorFlow. SMARTech Repository (Georgia Institute of Technology).11 indexed citations
7.
Wojna, Zbigniew, Jasper Uijlings, Sergio Guadarrama, et al.. (2017). The Devil is in the Decoder. arXiv (Cornell University).11 indexed citations
8.
Myers, Austin, Nick Johnston, Vivek Rathod, et al.. (2015). Im2Calories: Towards an Automated Mobile Vision Food Diary. 1233–1241.320 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Silberman, Nathan & Rob Fergus. (2011). Indoor scene segmentation using a structured light sensor.326 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Silberman, Nathan, et al.. (2010). Case for automated detection of diabetic retinopathy. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 85–90.41 indexed citations
11.
McDonald, Ryan, et al.. (2009). Efficient Large-Scale Distributed Training of Conditional Maximum Entropy Models. Neural Information Processing Systems. 22. 1231–1239.137 indexed citations
12.
Silberman, Nathan, et al.. (2009). On the rise and fall of ISPs.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.