Natasha Stevens

621 total citations
23 papers, 267 citations indexed

About

Natasha Stevens is a scholar working on Rheumatology, Surgery and Gastroenterology. According to data from OpenAlex, Natasha Stevens has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 267 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Rheumatology, 12 papers in Surgery and 7 papers in Gastroenterology. Recurrent topics in Natasha Stevens's work include Pelvic floor disorders treatments (13 papers), Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (7 papers) and Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (7 papers). Natasha Stevens is often cited by papers focused on Pelvic floor disorders treatments (13 papers), Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (7 papers) and Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (7 papers). Natasha Stevens collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Australia. Natasha Stevens's co-authors include Charles H. Knowles, Emma J Horrocks, Christine Norton, Sandra Eldridge, P. R. O’Connell, Stephen Bremner, James Mason, Steven R. Brown, Ugo Grossi and A. B. Williams and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Thorax.

In The Last Decade

Natasha Stevens

20 papers receiving 262 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Natasha Stevens United Kingdom 10 163 151 64 42 34 23 267
P Lolli Italy 8 218 1.3× 170 1.1× 40 0.6× 30 0.7× 66 1.9× 19 260
V. Piloni Italy 11 391 2.4× 385 2.5× 55 0.9× 68 1.6× 55 1.6× 21 473
Philippe Denis France 7 65 0.4× 35 0.2× 26 0.4× 14 0.3× 9 0.3× 10 320
Roberto Dino Villani Italy 7 301 1.8× 281 1.9× 65 1.0× 65 1.5× 72 2.1× 8 347
Ergun Erdoğan Türkiye 10 225 1.4× 10 0.1× 30 0.5× 12 0.3× 7 0.2× 28 331
R Morger Switzerland 6 253 1.6× 28 0.2× 48 0.8× 9 0.2× 5 0.1× 31 327
B. Lestár Belgium 9 368 2.3× 340 2.3× 55 0.9× 96 2.3× 16 0.5× 17 407
Andrew M. Bell Australia 8 155 1.0× 61 0.4× 92 1.4× 74 1.8× 3 0.1× 10 246
Elizabeth P. Shea United States 9 157 1.0× 76 0.5× 226 3.5× 11 0.3× 15 406
A. Holschneider Germany 6 358 2.2× 53 0.4× 53 0.8× 4 0.1× 13 0.4× 11 378

Countries citing papers authored by Natasha Stevens

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natasha Stevens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natasha Stevens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natasha Stevens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natasha Stevens

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natasha Stevens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natasha Stevens. The network helps show where Natasha Stevens may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natasha Stevens

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natasha Stevens. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natasha Stevens based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natasha Stevens. Natasha Stevens is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Zarghami, Amin, Kalina Makowiecki, Natasha Stevens, et al.. (2024). Low-intensity repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation is safe and well tolerated by people living with MS – outcomes of the phase I randomised controlled trial (TAURUS). Multiple Sclerosis Journal - Experimental Translational and Clinical. 10(2). 3110615771–3110615771. 3 indexed citations
2.
Vollebregt, Paul F., Yan Li Goh, Claire Chan, et al.. (2024). Clinical effectiveness of subsensory sacral neuromodulation in adults with faecal incontinence: the SUBSoNIC crossover RCT and mechanistic study. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1–98.
5.
Norton, Christine, Steven R. Brown, Sandra Eldridge, et al.. (2023). Habit training versus habit training with direct visual biofeedback in adults with chronic constipation: A randomized controlled trial. Colorectal Disease. 25(11). 2243–2256.
6.
Grossi, Ugo, Steven R. Brown, Sandra Eldridge, et al.. (2022). Stepped-wedge randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy in adults with chronic constipation. Techniques in Coloproctology. 26(12). 941–952. 2 indexed citations
7.
Makowiecki, Kalina, Natasha Stevens, Carlie L. Cullen, et al.. (2022). Safety of low-intensity repetitive transcranial magneTic brAin stimUlation foR people living with mUltiple Sclerosis (TAURUS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 23(1). 626–626. 9 indexed citations
8.
Crowley, Evelyn M., Shaun Treweek, Katie Banister, et al.. (2020). Using systematic data categorisation to quantify the types of data collected in clinical trials: the DataCat project. Trials. 21(1). 535–535. 10 indexed citations
9.
Grossi, Ugo, Natasha Stevens, Eleanor McAlees, et al.. (2018). Stepped-wedge randomised trial of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy in adults with chronic constipation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 19(1). 90–90. 5 indexed citations
10.
McAlees, Eleanor, Paul F. Vollebregt, Natasha Stevens, et al.. (2018). Efficacy and mechanism of sub-sensory sacral (optimised) neuromodulation in adults with faecal incontinence: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 19(1). 336–336. 10 indexed citations
11.
Norton, Christine, Anton Emmanuel, Natasha Stevens, et al.. (2017). Habit training versus habit training with direct visual biofeedback in adults with chronic constipation: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 18(1). 139–139. 7 indexed citations
12.
Horrocks, Emma J, Sami A. Chadi, Natasha Stevens, Steven D. Wexner, & Charles H. Knowles. (2017). Factors Associated With Efficacy of Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation for Fecal Incontinence, Based on Post-Hoc Analysis of Data From a Randomized Trial. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 15(12). 1915–1921.e2. 13 indexed citations
13.
Close, Helen, James Mason, Natasha Stevens, et al.. (2017). Low-volume versus high-volume initiated trans-anal irrigation therapy in adults with chronic constipation: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 18(1). 151–151. 8 indexed citations
14.
Knowles, Charles H., Ugo Grossi, Emma J Horrocks, et al.. (2017). Surgery for constipation: systematic review and practice recommendations. Colorectal Disease. 19(S3). 101–113. 27 indexed citations
15.
Horrocks, Emma J, Stephen Bremner, Natasha Stevens, et al.. (2015). OC-007 Double blind randomised controlled trial of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for the treatment of faecal incontinence in adults. A4.1–A4. 1 indexed citations
19.
Lutzky, Viviana P., Pauline Crooks, Natasha Stevens, et al.. (2013). Cytotoxic T Cell Adoptive Immunotherapy as a Treatment for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology. 21(2). 256–259. 30 indexed citations
20.
Hanifa, Yasmeen, M.H. Patel, Natasha Stevens, et al.. (2013). S123 Increased risk of upper respiratory infection with addition of intermittent bolus-dose vitamin D supplementation to a daily low-dose regimen. Thorax. 68(Suppl 3). A64.1–A64. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026