Natasha Roberts

872 total citations
50 papers, 507 citations indexed

About

Natasha Roberts is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Oncology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Natasha Roberts has authored 50 papers receiving a total of 507 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in General Health Professions, 18 papers in Oncology and 17 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Natasha Roberts's work include Cancer survivorship and care (10 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (9 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (8 papers). Natasha Roberts is often cited by papers focused on Cancer survivorship and care (10 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (9 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (8 papers). Natasha Roberts collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Natasha Roberts's co-authors include Angela M. Stover, David Wyld, Monika Janda, Kimberly Alexander, Caroline Potter, Kimberly Manalili, Joanne Greenhalgh, Sara Ahmed, Maria Santana and Lotte Haverman and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy and Journal of Medical Internet Research.

In The Last Decade

Natasha Roberts

44 papers receiving 498 citations

Peers

Natasha Roberts
Luciana Puchalski Kalinke Brazil
Helen Jones United Kingdom
Anne Starker Germany
Ruth McConigley Australia
Elvan Daniels United States
Tyna Taskila United Kingdom
Peter Scalia United States
Nigel Hart United Kingdom
Elizabeth A. Fradgley Australia
Kathryn Bouskill United States
Luciana Puchalski Kalinke Brazil
Natasha Roberts
Citations per year, relative to Natasha Roberts Natasha Roberts (= 1×) peers Luciana Puchalski Kalinke

Countries citing papers authored by Natasha Roberts

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natasha Roberts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natasha Roberts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natasha Roberts more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natasha Roberts

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natasha Roberts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natasha Roberts. The network helps show where Natasha Roberts may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natasha Roberts

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natasha Roberts. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natasha Roberts based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natasha Roberts. Natasha Roberts is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Mohammed, Solomon Ahmed, et al.. (2025). Implementation of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy program in the contemporary health care system: A narrative review of the evidence. Journal of Infection and Public Health. 18(10). 102938–102938. 1 indexed citations
2.
Roberts, Matthew J., Natasha Roberts, Anita Pelecanos, et al.. (2025). A prospective, multi-centre trial of PSMA-PET compared to FDG-PET for staging of newly diagnosed high risk prostate cancer. EJNMMI Research. 15(1). 92–92. 1 indexed citations
3.
Unni, Elizabeth, Liv Marit Valen Schougaard, Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi, et al.. (2025). Expert consensus on implementing patient-reported outcomes in telehealth: findings from an international Delphi study. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes. 9(1). 40–40. 1 indexed citations
4.
Ullman, Amanda, Emily Larsen, Victoria Gibson, et al.. (2024). An mHealth application for chronic vascular access: A multi‐method evaluation. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 33(5). 1762–1776.
5.
Maharaj, Ashika, et al.. (2024). The use of patient reported outcome measures in oncology clinical practice across Australia and New Zealand. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes. 8(1). 1–1. 3 indexed citations
6.
Smith, Sandra, Catherine Travers, Natasha Roberts, & Melinda Martin‐Khan. (2024). Development of person‐centred quality indicators for aged care assessment services in Australia: A mixed methods study. Health Expectations. 27(1). e13958–e13958. 3 indexed citations
7.
Roberts, Natasha, et al.. (2024). Patient engagement in quality of life research. Quality of Life Research. 33(10). 2781–2782.
8.
Delaney, Geoff P., Michael Jefford, Raymond J. Chan, et al.. (2023). Proceedings of the 2nd Implementation Science Health Conference Australia: Sydney, NSW, Australia, 23-24 March 2023. Implementation Science. 18(S2). 38–38. 1 indexed citations
9.
10.
Unni, Elizabeth, Theresa Coles, Danielle C. Lavallee, et al.. (2023). Patient adherence to patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) completion in clinical care: current understanding and future recommendations. Quality of Life Research. 33(1). 281–290. 25 indexed citations
11.
12.
Mazariego, Carolyn, Michael Jefford, Raymond J. Chan, et al.. (2022). Priority recommendations for the implementation of patient-reported outcomes in clinical cancer care: a Delphi study. Journal of Cancer Survivorship. 16(1). 33–43. 25 indexed citations
13.
Ahern, Elizabeth, Natasha Roberts, Bryan Chan, et al.. (2021). Semiqualitative research protocol to explore cancer care workforce perceptions of the health system response to COVID-19 preparations in Southeast Queensland, Australia. BMJ Open. 11(5). e044655–e044655. 2 indexed citations
14.
Stover, Angela M., Lotte Haverman, Hedy A. van Oers, et al.. (2020). Using an implementation science approach to implement and evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) initiatives in routine care settings. Quality of Life Research. 30(11). 3015–3033. 173 indexed citations
15.
Campbell, Jill, et al.. (2020). Skin and wound care for individuals with graft versus host disease: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open. 10(10). e038567–e038567. 3 indexed citations
16.
Roberts, Natasha, Kimberly Alexander, David Wyld, & Monika Janda. (2020). Statistical process control assessed implementation fidelity of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in routine care. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 127. 76–86. 8 indexed citations
17.
Roberts, Natasha, Alison Mudge, Kimberly Alexander, David Wyld, & Monika Janda. (2019). The iPROMOS protocol: a stepped-wedge study to implement routine patient-reported outcomes in a medical oncology outpatient setting. BMJ Open. 9(2). e027046–e027046. 9 indexed citations
18.
Mercieca‐Bebber, Rebecca, Claudia Rutherford, Lucy Busija, et al.. (2018). Trials with proxy-reported outcomes registered on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR). Quality of Life Research. 28(4). 955–962. 3 indexed citations
19.
Roberts, Natasha, Monika Janda, Kimberly Alexander, & David Wyld. (2017). Patient reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical practice: a scoping review of reviews, systematic review and meta-analysis of the research. Psycho-Oncology. 26. 73–73. 1 indexed citations
20.
Hardré, Patricia L., David W. Sullivan, & Natasha Roberts. (2008). Rural Teachers' Best Motivating Strategies: A Blending of Teachers' and Students' Perspectives. SHAREOK (University of Oklahoma). 30(1). 19–31. 15 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Luciana Puchalski Kalinke Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Helen Jones Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Anne Starker Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ruth McConigley Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Elvan Daniels Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Tyna Taskila Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Peter Scalia Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Nigel Hart Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Elizabeth A. Fradgley Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kathryn Bouskill
Rankless by CCL
2026