Natalie Meyer

1.9k total citations · 1 hit paper
7 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

Natalie Meyer is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Ecology and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Natalie Meyer has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Molecular Biology, 2 papers in Ecology and 2 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Natalie Meyer's work include Cell death mechanisms and regulation (2 papers), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (2 papers) and Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (2 papers). Natalie Meyer is often cited by papers focused on Cell death mechanisms and regulation (2 papers), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (2 papers) and Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (2 papers). Natalie Meyer collaborates with scholars based in Canada, Switzerland and United States. Natalie Meyer's co-authors include Linda Z. Penn, Stanley J. Korsmeyer, Kyoung Joon Oh, R. John Collier, Scott Barbuto, Daniel Hoces, Christopher M. Field, Hans‐Joachim Ruscheweyh, Shinichi Sunagawa and Mirjam Zünd and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Nature reviews. Cancer and Cancer Research.

In The Last Decade

Natalie Meyer

6 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Reflecting on 25 years with MYC

2008 1.2k citations Natalie Meyer, Linda Z. Penn Nature reviews. Cancer profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Natalie Meyer Canada	5	1.2k	351	337	138	108	7	1.5k
Wouter Nijkamp Netherlands	8	1.3k 1.1×	401 1.1×	264 0.8×	73 0.5×	75 0.7×	9	1.6k
Jana Karásková Canada	17	870 0.8×	379 1.1×	333 1.0×	104 0.8×	104 1.0×	22	1.4k
Anthony C. Liang United States	14	1.4k 1.2×	495 1.4×	356 1.1×	167 1.2×	189 1.8×	22	1.9k
Steffi Herold Germany	16	1.4k 1.2×	486 1.4×	267 0.8×	75 0.5×	154 1.4×	22	1.6k
Arianna Sabò Italy	19	1.5k 1.3×	430 1.2×	300 0.9×	114 0.8×	269 2.5×	25	1.9k
Brenda O’Connell United States	15	1.4k 1.2×	480 1.4×	292 0.9×	81 0.6×	168 1.6×	21	1.7k
Linda C. Harris United States	22	1.2k 1.0×	522 1.5×	349 1.0×	90 0.7×	52 0.5×	44	1.4k
S Sakiyama Japan	21	874 0.8×	378 1.1×	237 0.7×	55 0.4×	148 1.4×	66	1.3k
Ken Sasai Japan	16	1.2k 1.0×	396 1.1×	190 0.6×	110 0.8×	172 1.6×	29	1.5k
Hena R. Ashar United States	12	1.2k 1.0×	522 1.5×	380 1.1×	122 0.9×	118 1.1×	13	1.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Meyer

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Meyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Meyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Meyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Meyer

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Meyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Meyer. The network helps show where Natalie Meyer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie Meyer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie Meyer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie Meyer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie Meyer. Natalie Meyer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Meyer, Natalie, et al.. (2024). Genomic characteristics of clinical non-toxigenic Vibrio cholerae isolates in Switzerland: a cross-sectional study. Swiss Medical Weekly. 154(4). 3437–3437. 2 indexed citations

2.

Zünd, Mirjam, Hans‐Joachim Ruscheweyh, Christopher M. Field, et al.. (2021). High throughput sequencing provides exact genomic locations of inducible prophages and accurate phage-to-host ratios in gut microbial strains. Microbiome. 9(1). 77–77. 23 indexed citations

3.

Bocher, Pierrick, et al.. (2021). International guidelines for monitoring breeding populations and levels of reproduction in the Eurasian Curlew Numenius arquata. Epsilon Open Archive (Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet biblioteket (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences)). 1 indexed citations

4.

Wasylishen, Amanda R., Michelle Chan‐Seng‐Yue, Dharmendra Dingar, et al.. (2013). MYC Phosphorylation at Novel Regulatory Regions Suppresses Transforming Activity. Cancer Research. 73(21). 6504–6515. 25 indexed citations

5.

Meyer, Natalie & Linda Z. Penn. (2008). Reflecting on 25 years with MYC. Nature reviews. Cancer. 8(12). 976–990. 1229 indexed citations breakdown →

6.

Meyer, Natalie, et al.. (2006). The Oscar-worthy role of Myc in apoptosis. Seminars in Cancer Biology. 16(4). 275–287. 97 indexed citations

7.

Oh, Kyoung Joon, et al.. (2004). Conformational Changes in BID, a Pro-apoptotic BCL-2 Family Member, upon Membrane Binding. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 280(1). 753–767. 75 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact