Natalie Lowell

997 total citations
9 papers, 618 citations indexed

About

Natalie Lowell is a scholar working on Ecology, Molecular Biology and Ecological Modeling. According to data from OpenAlex, Natalie Lowell has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 618 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Ecology, 4 papers in Molecular Biology and 3 papers in Ecological Modeling. Recurrent topics in Natalie Lowell's work include Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies (6 papers), Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (4 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (3 papers). Natalie Lowell is often cited by papers focused on Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies (6 papers), Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (4 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (3 papers). Natalie Lowell collaborates with scholars based in United States and Denmark. Natalie Lowell's co-authors include Ryan P. Kelly, James L. O’Donnell, Andrew O. Shelton, Jameal F. Samhouri, Gregory D. Williams, Jesse A. Port, Rebecca Martone, Philip Francis Thomsen, Larry B. Crowder and Megan Mach and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, PLoS ONE and Ecology.

In The Last Decade

Natalie Lowell

9 papers receiving 602 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Natalie Lowell United States	8	546	434	64	59	55	9	618
Zachary Gold United States	12	616 1.1×	483 1.1×	65 1.0×	64 1.1×	26 0.5×	25	659
Philip D. Lamb United Kingdom	6	342 0.6×	240 0.6×	62 1.0×	51 0.9×	45 0.8×	11	439
Katrina M. West Australia	9	392 0.7×	308 0.7×	42 0.7×	53 0.9×	22 0.4×	18	437
Ramón Gallego United States	11	560 1.0×	400 0.9×	72 1.1×	49 0.8×	37 0.7×	22	616
Hilary Starks United States	6	483 0.9×	386 0.9×	45 0.7×	61 1.0×	24 0.4×	7	550
Matthew J. Heydenrych Australia	9	370 0.7×	300 0.7×	21 0.3×	55 0.9×	54 1.0×	13	413
Cristina Di Muri Italy	10	384 0.7×	342 0.8×	42 0.7×	129 2.2×	77 1.4×	24	473
Charles Baillie United Kingdom	12	387 0.7×	336 0.8×	54 0.8×	76 1.3×	48 0.9×	15	464
Magdalena Guardiola Spain	6	483 0.9×	347 0.8×	86 1.3×	24 0.4×	26 0.5×	6	544
Maarten De Brauwer Australia	13	390 0.7×	198 0.5×	93 1.5×	71 1.2×	18 0.3×	26	465

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Lowell

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Lowell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Lowell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Lowell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Lowell

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Lowell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Lowell. The network helps show where Natalie Lowell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie Lowell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie Lowell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie Lowell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie Lowell. Natalie Lowell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Lowell, Natalie, et al.. (2023). Population structure and adaptive differentiation in the sea cucumber Apostichopus californicus and implications for spatial resource management. PLoS ONE. 18(3). e0280500–e0280500. 6 indexed citations

2.

Garbelotto, Matteo, Natalie Lowell, Irene Y. Chen, & Todd Osmundson. (2019). Evidence for inhibition of a fungal biocontrol agent by a plant microbiome. Journal of Plant Pathology. 101(3). 457–466. 12 indexed citations

3.

O’Donnell, James L., Ryan P. Kelly, Andrew O. Shelton, et al.. (2017). Spatial distribution of environmental DNA in a nearshore marine habitat. PeerJ. 5. e3044–e3044. 129 indexed citations

4.

O’Donnell, James L., Ryan P. Kelly, Natalie Lowell, & Jesse A. Port. (2016). Indexed PCR Primers Induce Template-Specific Bias in Large-Scale DNA Sequencing Studies. PLoS ONE. 11(3). e0148698–e0148698. 85 indexed citations

5.

Kelly, Ryan P., James L. O’Donnell, Natalie Lowell, et al.. (2016). Genetic signatures of ecological diversity along an urbanization gradient. PeerJ. 4. e2444–e2444. 63 indexed citations

6.

Lowell, Natalie & Ryan P. Kelly. (2016). Evaluating agency use of “best available science” under the United States Endangered Species Act. Biological Conservation. 196. 53–59. 33 indexed citations

7.

Shelton, Andrew O., James L. O’Donnell, Jameal F. Samhouri, et al.. (2016). A framework for inferring biological communities from environmental DNA. Ecological Applications. 26(6). 1645–1659. 68 indexed citations

8.

Kelly, Ryan P., Jesse A. Port, Kevan M. Yamahara, et al.. (2014). Harnessing DNA to improve environmental management. Science. 344(6191). 1455–1456. 198 indexed citations

9.

Newman, Erica A., Mary Ellen Harte, Natalie Lowell, M. Wilber, & John Harte. (2014). Empirical tests of within‐ and across‐species energetics in a diverse plant community. Ecology. 95(10). 2815–2825. 24 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact