Natalie Linke

713 total citations
9 papers, 153 citations indexed

About

Natalie Linke is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Epidemiology and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Natalie Linke has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 153 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, 4 papers in Epidemiology and 3 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Natalie Linke's work include Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (6 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers) and Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (3 papers). Natalie Linke is often cited by papers focused on Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (6 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers) and Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (3 papers). Natalie Linke collaborates with scholars based in Australia, New Zealand and Brazil. Natalie Linke's co-authors include Rinaldo Bellomo, Michael Bailey, Carol Hodgson, Michelle Paton, Rakshit Panwar, Shay McGuinness, Colin McArthur, Diane Mackle, Ross Freebairn and Adam M. Deane and has published in prestigious journals such as Intensive Care Medicine, Critical Care and Journal of Critical Care.

In The Last Decade

Natalie Linke

9 papers receiving 150 citations

Peers

Natalie Linke

CCICM

EPIDE

PRM

EM

SURGE

Evan Cassity United States

Haikel Oueslati France

Marie-Céline Fournier France

Speranza Bocchino Italy

Andreas Koköfer Austria

Maie Templeton United Kingdom

Maud Jonas France

Fabien Grelon France

Junji Kumasawa Japan

Mehrnaz Pajoumand United States

Evan Cassity United States

Natalie Linke

61 ×0.8

CCICM

12 ×0.2

EPIDE

44 ×0.8

PRM

22 ×0.5

EM

21 ×0.7

SURGE

Citations per year, relative to Natalie Linke Natalie Linke (= 1×) peers Evan Cassity

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Linke

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Linke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Linke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Linke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Linke

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Linke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Linke. The network helps show where Natalie Linke may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie Linke

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie Linke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie Linke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie Linke. Natalie Linke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Paton, Michelle, Rebecca Lane, Eldho Paul, et al.. (2022). Correlation of patient-reported outcome measures to performance-based function in critical care survivors: PREDICTABLE. Australian Critical Care. 36(4). 485–491. 10 indexed citations

2.

Ross, Paul, et al.. (2022). Nursing workforce, education, and training challenges to implementing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation services in Australian intensive care units: A qualitative substudy. Australian Critical Care. 36(1). 114–118. 10 indexed citations

3.

Young, Paul J., Diane Mackle, Carol Hodgson, et al.. (2022). Conservative or liberal oxygen therapy for mechanically ventilated adults with acute brain pathologies: A post-hoc subgroup analysis. Journal of Critical Care. 71. 154079–154079. 4 indexed citations

4.

Hodgson, Carol, Alisa M. Higgins, Michael Bailey, et al.. (2022). Comparison of 6-month outcomes of sepsis versus non-sepsis critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Critical Care. 26(1). 174–174. 14 indexed citations

5.

Paton, Michelle, et al.. (2022). Correlation of objectively measured function to patient-reported outcome measures in critical care survivors (predictable). Australian Critical Care. 35. S13–S13. 1 indexed citations

6.

Higgins, Alisa M., Ary Serpa Neto, Michael Bailey, et al.. (2021). The psychometric properties and minimal clinically important difference for disability assessment using WHODAS 2.0 in critically ill patients. Critical Care and Resuscitation. 23(1). 103–112. 22 indexed citations

7.

Higgins, Alisa M., Ary Serpa Neto, Michael Bailey, et al.. (2021). Predictors of death and new disability after critical illness: a multicentre prospective cohort study. Intensive Care Medicine. 47(7). 772–781. 28 indexed citations

8.

Young, Paul J., Diane Mackle, Rinaldo Bellomo, et al.. (2019). Conservative oxygen therapy for mechanically ventilated adults with sepsis: a post hoc analysis of data from the intensive care unit randomized trial comparing two approaches to oxygen therapy (ICU-ROX). Intensive Care Medicine. 46(1). 17–26. 56 indexed citations

9.

Mackle, Diane, Michael Bailey, Richard Beasley, et al.. (2018). Protocol summary and statistical analysis plan for the intensive care unit randomised trial comparing two approaches to oxygen therapy (ICU-ROX). Critical Care and Resuscitation. 20(1). 22–32. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact