Natalie Kelly

1.4k total citations
30 papers, 994 citations indexed

About

Natalie Kelly is a scholar working on Ecology, Global and Planetary Change and Atmospheric Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Natalie Kelly has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 994 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Ecology, 10 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 9 papers in Atmospheric Science. Recurrent topics in Natalie Kelly's work include Marine animal studies overview (24 papers), Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics (9 papers) and Marine and fisheries research (7 papers). Natalie Kelly is often cited by papers focused on Marine animal studies overview (24 papers), Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics (9 papers) and Marine and fisheries research (7 papers). Natalie Kelly collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Natalie Kelly's co-authors include David Peel, Amanda Hodgson, Esmee van Wijk, Stephen Nicol, So Kawaguchi, Joshua N. Smith, Brian Miller, Mark V. Bravington, Ari S. Friedlaender and Ian Renner and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and New Phytologist.

In The Last Decade

Natalie Kelly

27 papers receiving 967 citations

Peers

Natalie Kelly
Monique MacKenzie United Kingdom
H. Murase Japan
Leonard Pearlstine United States
Blake M. Allan Australia
David O. Wallin United States
Russell Leaper United Kingdom
Vincent Raoult Australia
Hugo Costa Portugal
Monique MacKenzie United Kingdom
Natalie Kelly
Citations per year, relative to Natalie Kelly Natalie Kelly (= 1×) peers Monique MacKenzie

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Kelly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Kelly's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Kelly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Kelly more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Kelly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Kelly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Kelly. The network helps show where Natalie Kelly may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie Kelly

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie Kelly. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie Kelly based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie Kelly. Natalie Kelly is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Smith, Joshua N., et al.. (2025). Persistence of breeding philopatry and cultural memory of the Great Barrier Reef as a humpback whale breeding ground. Biological Conservation. 308. 111212–111212.
2.
Wotherspoon, Simon, H. Murase, Natalie Kelly, et al.. (2025). Resource potential and maturity estimates of Euphausia superba in East Antarctica. Frontiers in Marine Science. 12.
3.
Kühn, Susanne, A. Meijboom, J.A. van Franeker, et al.. (2024). Distribution of Arnoux's beaked whales (Berardius arnuxii). Marine Mammal Science. 41(1).
4.
Miller, Brian, Virginia Andrews‐Goff, Jay Barlow, et al.. (2024). Antarctic sonobuoy surveys for blue whales from 2006-2021 reveal contemporary distribution, changes over time, and paths to further our understanding of their distribution and biology. Frontiers in Marine Science. 11. 2 indexed citations
5.
Biuw, Martin, Ulf Lindstrøm, Jennifer A. Jackson, et al.. (2024). Estimated summer abundance and krill consumption of fin whales throughout the Scotia Sea during the 2018/2019 summer season. Scientific Reports. 14(1). 7493–7493. 7 indexed citations
6.
Hodgson, Amanda, Natalie Kelly, & David Peel. (2023). Drone images afford more detections of marine wildlife than real-time observers during simultaneous large-scale surveys. PeerJ. 11. e16186–e16186. 4 indexed citations
7.
Brown, Alexander M., Simon J. Allen, Natalie Kelly, & Amanda Hodgson. (2022). Using Unoccupied Aerial Vehicles to estimate availability and group size error for aerial surveys of coastal dolphins. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation. 9(3). 340–353. 7 indexed citations
8.
Miller, Brian, et al.. (2022). Deep learning algorithm outperforms experienced human observer at detection of blue whale D‐calls: a double‐observer analysis. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation. 9(1). 104–116. 28 indexed citations
9.
Warwick‐Evans, Victoria, Natalie Kelly, Luciano Dalla Rosa, et al.. (2022). Using seabird and whale distribution models to estimate spatial consumption of krill to inform fishery management. Ecosphere. 13(6). 32 indexed citations
10.
Madhusudhana, Shyam, et al.. (2022). Automated detection of blue whale D-calls using deep learning with a double-observer performance assessment. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 151(4_Supplement). A29–A29. 2 indexed citations
11.
Smith, Joshua N., Natalie Kelly, & Ian Renner. (2020). Validation of presence‐only models for conservation planning and the application to whales in a multiple‐use marine park. Ecological Applications. 31(1). e02214–e02214. 28 indexed citations
12.
Kelly, Natalie, Luciano Dalla Rosa, David E. Cade, et al.. (2020). A comparison of baleen whale density estimates derived from overlapping satellite imagery and a shipborne survey. Scientific Reports. 10(1). 12985–12985. 31 indexed citations
13.
Herr, Helena, Natalie Kelly, Boris Dorschel, et al.. (2019). Aerial surveys for Antarctic minke whales (Balaenoptera bonaerensis) reveal sea ice dependent distribution patterns. Ecology and Evolution. 9(10). 5664–5682. 22 indexed citations
14.
Hodgson, Amanda, David Peel, & Natalie Kelly. (2017). Unmanned aerial vehicles for surveying marine fauna: assessing detection probability. Ecological Applications. 27(4). 1253–1267. 102 indexed citations
15.
Peel, David, Brian Miller, Natalie Kelly, et al.. (2014). A Simulation Study of Acoustic-Assisted Tracking of Whales for Mark-Recapture Surveys. PLoS ONE. 9(5). e95602–e95602. 10 indexed citations
16.
Williams, Rob, Natalie Kelly, Olaf Boebel, et al.. (2014). Counting whales in a challenging, changing environment. Scientific Reports. 4(1). 4170–4170. 40 indexed citations
17.
Hodgson, Amanda, Natalie Kelly, & David Peel. (2013). Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) for Surveying Marine Fauna: A Dugong Case Study. PLoS ONE. 8(11). e79556–e79556. 307 indexed citations
18.
Kelly, Natalie, Roger Cousens, Mohammad Sadegh Taghizadeh, Jim Hanan, & David Mouillot. (2013). Plants as populations of release sites for seed dispersal: a structural‐statistical analysis of the effects of competition on Raphanus raphanistrum. Journal of Ecology. 101(4). 878–888. 7 indexed citations
19.
Duursma, Remko A., Daniel S. Falster, Fernando Valladares, et al.. (2011). Light interception efficiency explained by two simple variables: a test using a diversity of small‐ to medium‐sized woody plants. New Phytologist. 193(2). 397–408. 88 indexed citations
20.
Turnbull, Tarryn L., Natalie Kelly, Mark A. Adams, & Charles R. Warren. (2007). Within-canopy nitrogen and photosynthetic gradients are unaffected by soil fertility in field-grown Eucalyptus globulus. Tree Physiology. 27(11). 1607–1617. 33 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026