Natalie E. King

497 total citations
8 papers, 333 citations indexed

About

Natalie E. King is a scholar working on Neurology, Surgery and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Natalie E. King has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 333 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Neurology, 2 papers in Surgery and 2 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Natalie E. King's work include Barrier Structure and Function Studies (5 papers), Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers) and Kruppel-like factors research (2 papers). Natalie E. King is often cited by papers focused on Barrier Structure and Function Studies (5 papers), Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers) and Kruppel-like factors research (2 papers). Natalie E. King collaborates with scholars based in Australia and New Zealand. Natalie E. King's co-authors include Jo‐Maree Courtney, Brad A. Sutherland, David W. Howells, Lachlan S. Brown, Catherine G. Foster, James C. Vickers, Jenna M. Ziebell, Kimberley E. Stuart, Anna E. King and Jessica M. Collins and has published in prestigious journals such as Neuroscience, Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology and Journal of Neuroscience Research.

In The Last Decade

Natalie E. King

7 papers receiving 330 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Natalie E. King Australia	5	176	90	51	47	36	8	333
Catherine G. Foster Australia	5	187 1.1×	99 1.1×	48 0.9×	50 1.1×	35 1.0×	5	340
Lachlan S. Brown Australia	6	199 1.1×	111 1.2×	53 1.0×	55 1.2×	36 1.0×	9	380
Nikolay Kutuzov Russia	6	130 0.7×	73 0.8×	44 0.9×	67 1.4×	25 0.7×	15	285
Lisa Greve Routhe Denmark	8	224 1.3×	134 1.5×	73 1.4×	69 1.5×	56 1.6×	13	480
Divya Channappa United States	7	191 1.1×	112 1.2×	81 1.6×	78 1.7×	24 0.7×	10	373
Miriam Scheld Germany	11	185 1.1×	128 1.4×	25 0.5×	48 1.0×	25 0.7×	14	377
Xiping Liang China	9	68 0.4×	104 1.2×	44 0.9×	33 0.7×	29 0.8×	20	305
Krzysztof Kucharz Denmark	11	109 0.6×	187 2.1×	44 0.9×	25 0.5×	36 1.0×	14	380
Wenhao Zhu China	12	87 0.5×	107 1.2×	19 0.4×	34 0.7×	46 1.3×	34	380
Zeinab Namjoo Iran	11	112 0.6×	108 1.2×	38 0.7×	19 0.4×	19 0.5×	15	391

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie E. King

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie E. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie E. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie E. King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie E. King

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie E. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie E. King. The network helps show where Natalie E. King may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie E. King

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie E. King. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie E. King based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie E. King. Natalie E. King is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

King, Natalie E., et al.. (2025). Biliary Dyskinesia - Is It Real?. JSLS Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons. 29(1). e2024.00053–e2024.00053.

2.

King, Natalie E., Jo‐Maree Courtney, Lachlan S. Brown, et al.. (2024). Induced pluripotent stem cell derived pericytes respond to mediators of proliferation and contractility. Stem Cell Research & Therapy. 15(1). 59–59. 4 indexed citations

3.

Brown, Lachlan S., Natalie E. King, Jo‐Maree Courtney, et al.. (2023). Brain pericytes in culture display diverse morphological and functional phenotypes. Cell Biology and Toxicology. 39(6). 2999–3014. 13 indexed citations

4.

King, Natalie E., et al.. (2023). Smoking History and the Development of Incisional Umbilical Hernia After Laparoscopic and Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Cholecystectomy. The American Surgeon. 89(8). 3501–3502. 2 indexed citations

5.

Morris, Gary P., Emma K. Gowing, Jo‐Maree Courtney, et al.. (2022). Vascular perfusion differs in two distinct PDGFRβ ‐positive zones within the ischemic core of male mice 2 weeks following photothrombotic stroke. Journal of Neuroscience Research. 101(2). 278–292. 7 indexed citations

6.

King, Natalie E., Jo‐Maree Courtney, Lachlan S. Brown, et al.. (2022). Pharmacological PDGFRβ inhibitors imatinib and sunitinib cause human brain pericyte death in vitro. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology. 444. 116025–116025. 7 indexed citations

7.

Stuart, Kimberley E., Anna E. King, Natalie E. King, et al.. (2019). Late-life environmental enrichment preserves short-term memory and may attenuate microglia in male APP/PS1 mice. Neuroscience. 408. 282–292. 18 indexed citations

8.

Brown, Lachlan S., Catherine G. Foster, Jo‐Maree Courtney, et al.. (2019). Pericytes and Neurovascular Function in the Healthy and Diseased Brain. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience. 13. 282–282. 282 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact