Natalia Petros

1.1k total citations
17 papers, 727 citations indexed

About

Natalia Petros is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Pharmacology and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Natalia Petros has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 727 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 7 papers in Pharmacology and 4 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Natalia Petros's work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (11 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (7 papers) and Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (7 papers). Natalia Petros is often cited by papers focused on Schizophrenia research and treatment (11 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (7 papers) and Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (7 papers). Natalia Petros collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Netherlands. Natalia Petros's co-authors include Sagnik Bhattacharyya, Philip McGuire, Ewa Klamerus, Robin Murray, Enrico Foglia, Lívia A. Carvalho, Tabea Schoeler, Marta Di Forti, Elizabeth Appiah‐Kusi and Paolo Fusar‐Poli and has published in prestigious journals such as The British Journal of Psychiatry, Schizophrenia Bulletin and Psychopharmacology.

In The Last Decade

Natalia Petros

14 papers receiving 715 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Natalia Petros United Kingdom 11 374 334 173 108 101 17 727
Caterina La Cascia Italy 14 273 0.7× 281 0.8× 232 1.3× 101 0.9× 111 1.1× 56 719
Alessandra Paparelli United Kingdom 11 445 1.2× 527 1.6× 260 1.5× 160 1.5× 278 2.8× 17 1.0k
David Semple United Kingdom 11 281 0.8× 356 1.1× 276 1.6× 158 1.5× 275 2.7× 25 929
Alain Dervaux France 13 328 0.9× 152 0.5× 200 1.2× 84 0.8× 114 1.1× 64 662
George A. Fraser Canada 9 228 0.6× 326 1.0× 289 1.7× 175 1.6× 122 1.2× 13 705
Susana Alberich Spain 18 525 1.4× 186 0.6× 230 1.3× 66 0.6× 109 1.1× 37 821
Elizabeth Appiah‐Kusi United Kingdom 11 198 0.5× 271 0.8× 157 0.9× 80 0.7× 96 1.0× 21 501
Aisling O’Neill United Kingdom 13 221 0.6× 233 0.7× 184 1.1× 197 1.8× 110 1.1× 28 602
Rebecca Kuepper Netherlands 11 434 1.2× 633 1.9× 198 1.1× 169 1.6× 321 3.2× 16 980
Simona A. Stilo United Kingdom 17 662 1.8× 511 1.5× 382 2.2× 173 1.6× 253 2.5× 26 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Natalia Petros

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalia Petros's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalia Petros with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalia Petros more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalia Petros

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalia Petros. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalia Petros. The network helps show where Natalia Petros may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalia Petros

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalia Petros. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalia Petros based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalia Petros. Natalia Petros is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Zahid, Uzma, Fern Day, Simone Ciufolini, et al.. (2025). Salivary cortisol measures across the clinical stages of psychosis: An individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 173. 107283–107283.
2.
Appiah‐Kusi, Elizabeth, Natalia Petros, Rebecca Wilson, et al.. (2020). Effects of short-term cannabidiol treatment on response to social stress in subjects at clinical high risk of developing psychosis. Psychopharmacology. 237(4). 1121–1130. 68 indexed citations
3.
Petros, Natalia, Alexis E. Cullen, Sandra Vieira, et al.. (2020). Examining service‐user perspectives for the development of a good outcome checklist for individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis. Early Intervention in Psychiatry. 15(3). 606–615. 8 indexed citations
4.
Wilson, Robin, Matthijs G. Bossong, Elizabeth Appiah‐Kusi, et al.. (2019). Cannabidiol attenuates insular dysfunction during motivational salience processing in subjects at clinical high risk for psychosis. Translational Psychiatry. 9(1). 203–203. 44 indexed citations
5.
Petros, Natalia, Andrea Mechelli, Paolo Fusar‐Poli, et al.. (2019). Towards a framework for good outcome in people at clinical high risk for psychosis: A Delphi consensus study. Schizophrenia Research. 208. 209–216. 6 indexed citations
6.
Oliver, Dominic, Thomas J. Reilly, Natalia Petros, et al.. (2019). What Causes the Onset of Psychosis in Individuals at Clinical High Risk? A Meta-analysis of Risk and Protective Factors. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 46(1). 110–120. 117 indexed citations
7.
Schoeler, Tabea, Natalia Petros, Marta Di Forti, et al.. (2017). Poor medication adherence and risk of relapse associated with continued cannabis use in patients with first-episode psychosis: a prospective analysis. The Lancet Psychiatry. 4(8). 627–633. 95 indexed citations
8.
Schoeler, Tabea, Natalia Petros, Marta Di Forti, et al.. (2017). Effect of continued cannabis use on medication adherence in the first two years following onset of psychosis. Psychiatry Research. 255. 36–41. 19 indexed citations
9.
Appiah‐Kusi, Elizabeth, Helen L. Fisher, Natalia Petros, et al.. (2017). Do cognitive schema mediate the association between childhood trauma and being at ultra-high risk for psychosis?. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 88. 89–96. 57 indexed citations
10.
Schoeler, Tabea & Natalia Petros. (2017). 156. Continued Cannabis and Substance Use in the First 2 Years Following Onset of Psychosis: Predicting Risk of Medication Nonadherence. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 43(suppl_1). S80–S81.
11.
Schoeler, Tabea, Natalia Petros, Marta Di Forti, et al.. (2016). Effects of continuation, frequency, and type of cannabis use on relapse in the first 2 years after onset of psychosis: an observational study. The Lancet Psychiatry. 3(10). 947–953. 117 indexed citations
12.
Schoeler, Tabea, Natalia Petros, Marta Di Forti, et al.. (2016). Association Between Continued Cannabis Use and Risk of Relapse in First-Episode Psychosis. JAMA Psychiatry. 73(11). 1173–1173. 75 indexed citations
13.
Petros, Natalia, Enrico Foglia, Ewa Klamerus, et al.. (2016). Impact of childhood trauma on risk of relapse requiring psychiatric hospital admission for psychosis. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 209(2). 169–170. 10 indexed citations
14.
Petros, Natalia & Lívia A. Carvalho. (2014). Horizons in Neuroscience Research. 68 indexed citations
15.
Petros, Natalia, Jolanta Opacka‐Juffry, & Jörg Huber. (2013). Psychometric and neurobiological assessment of resilience in a non-clinical sample of adults. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 38(10). 2099–2108. 40 indexed citations
16.
Huber, Johanna, et al.. (2013). 13th European Congress of Psychology (ECP 2013). 2 indexed citations
17.
Petros, Natalia, et al.. (2005). HIV/AIDS/STI/TB knowledge, attitudes and practices among lay health workers and nurses in KwaZulu Natal, South Africa. Africa Journal of Nursing and Midwifery. 7(2). 17–34. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Caterina La Cascia Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Alessandra Paparelli Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by David Semple Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Alain Dervaux Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by George A. Fraser Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Susana Alberich Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Elizabeth Appiah‐Kusi Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Aisling O’Neill Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rebecca Kuepper Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Simona A. Stilo
Rankless by CCL
2026