Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Technology, Humanness, and Trust: Rethinking Trust in Technology
2015345 citationsNancy K. Lankton, D. Harrison McKnight et al.Journal of the Association for Information Systemsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Nancy K. Lankton
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Nancy K. Lankton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nancy K. Lankton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nancy K. Lankton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nancy K. Lankton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nancy K. Lankton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nancy K. Lankton. The network helps show where Nancy K. Lankton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nancy K. Lankton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nancy K. Lankton.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nancy K. Lankton based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Nancy K. Lankton. Nancy K. Lankton is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lankton, Nancy K., D. Harrison McKnight, & John Tripp. (2015). Technology, Humanness, and Trust: Rethinking Trust in Technology. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 16(10). 880–918.345 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Lankton, Nancy K. & John Tripp. (2013). A Quantitative and Qualitative Study of Facebook Privacy using the Antecedent-Privacy Concern-Outcome Macro Model. Americas Conference on Information Systems.12 indexed citations
7.
Wilson, E. Vance & Nancy K. Lankton. (2012). Some Unfortunate Consequences of Non-Randomized, Grouped-Item Survey Administration in IS Research. International Conference on Information Systems.12 indexed citations
Jung, Eun Ju, et al.. (2012). Three Processes that Form Online Social Networking Post-Adoptive Use Intention. 3168–3178.1 indexed citations
10.
Jung, Eun Ju, et al.. (2011). The Surprising Lack of Effect of Privacy Concerns on Intention to Use Online Social Networks. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.6 indexed citations
Wilson, E. Vance, et al.. (2009). Demographic Trends in Consumer E-Health Adoption: Analysis of NCI HINTS 2003 and 2005 National Surveys. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 724.4 indexed citations
Wilson, E. Vance & Nancy K. Lankton. (2004). Research and Publication Opportunities at the Intersection of IS and Healthcare. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 572.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.