Nadia Steiber
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Gender Studies top 2%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Demography top 2%
- Co-authors
- Barbara HaasMartina DieckhoffCaroline BerghammerClaire WallaceAndrea E. SchmidtRicardo RodriguesMartin KohliSergei Scherbov
- Topics
- Employment and Welfare Studies (13 papers)Social Policy and Reform Studies (10 papers)Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (9 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONESocial Science & Medicine
In The Last Decade
Nadia Steiber
37 papers receiving 837 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Sociology and Political Science 470
- General Health Professions 291
- Gender Studies 270
- Political Science and International Relations 196
- Demography 161
Countries citing papers authored by Nadia Steiber
This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia Steiber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia Steiber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia Steiber more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia Steiber
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia Steiber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia Steiber. The network helps show where Nadia Steiber may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nadia Steiber
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nadia Steiber. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nadia Steiber based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nadia Steiber. Nadia Steiber is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 47 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 35 | |
| 13 | 107 | |
| 14 | 20 | |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | Combining the Entry of Young People in the Labour Market with the Retention of Older Workers | 6 |
| 17 | Ideals or Compromises? The Attitude-Behaviour Relationship in Mothers' Employment | 1 |
| 18 | First European quality of life survey: time use and work-life options over the life course | 13 |
| 19 | The relationship between home and work in an enlarged Europe: a quantitative analysis | 1 |
| 20 | 53 |
About Nadia Steiber
Nadia Steiber is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Gender Studies and General Health Professions, having authored 40 papers that have together received 902 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Employment and Welfare Studies (13 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (10 papers) and Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (270 citations), Demography (161 citations) and General Health Professions (291 citations). Nadia Steiber has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Barbara Haas, Martina Dieckhoff, Caroline Berghammer, Claire Wallace, Andrea E. Schmidt, Ricardo Rodrigues, Martin Kohli, Sergei Scherbov, Valeria Bordone and Bernhard Kittel. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Social Science & Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.