Nadia Bolognini
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Neurology top 0.1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 0.5%
- Social Psychology top 1%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 1%
- Co-authors
- Angelo MaravitaGiuseppe VallarFelipe FregniElisabetta LàdavasÁlvaro Pascual‐LeoneFrancesca FrassinettiDylan J. EdwardsLotfi B. Merabet
- Topics
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (50 papers)Multisensory perception and integration (44 papers)Action Observation and Synchronization (38 papers)
- Partner nations
- ItalyUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Nadia Bolognini
169 papers receiving 6.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
- Cognitive Neuroscience 3.8k
- Neurology 2.7k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.6k
- Social Psychology 1.2k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 818
Countries citing papers authored by Nadia Bolognini
This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia Bolognini's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia Bolognini with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia Bolognini more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia Bolognini
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia Bolognini. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia Bolognini. The network helps show where Nadia Bolognini may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nadia Bolognini
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nadia Bolognini. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nadia Bolognini based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nadia Bolognini. Nadia Bolognini is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 17 | |
| 14 | 36 | |
| 15 | 31 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | Discrimination of biomechanically possible and impossible hand movements at birth (vol 86, pg 632, 2015) | 0 |
| 19 | 43 | |
| 20 | 63 |
About Nadia Bolognini
Nadia Bolognini is a scholar working on Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 183 papers that have together received 6.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (50 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (44 papers) and Action Observation and Synchronization (38 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (2.7k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (3.8k citations) and Sensory Systems (623 citations). Nadia Bolognini has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Angelo Maravita, Giuseppe Vallar, Felipe Fregni, Elisabetta Làdavas, Álvaro Pascual‐Leone, Francesca Frassinetti, Dylan J. Edwards, Lotfi B. Merabet, Angela Rossetti and Cristina Russo. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Neuroscience and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.