Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Identification of Clostridium difficile as a cause of pseudomembranous colitis.
1978354 citationsR.H. George, J Symonds et al.BMJprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of N Shinagawa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N Shinagawa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N Shinagawa more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by N Shinagawa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N Shinagawa. The network helps show where N Shinagawa may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of N Shinagawa
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of N Shinagawa.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of N Shinagawa based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with N Shinagawa. N Shinagawa is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Shinagawa, N, et al.. (1992). [Identification and antibiotic prophylaxis of high-risk patients in biliary tract surgery].. PubMed. 93(2). 162–8.1 indexed citations
Shinagawa, N, Masaaki Taniguchi, H Takeyama, & T Manabe. (1991). [Complication of the central vein catheterization].. PubMed. 49 Suppl. 174–7.
10.
Shinagawa, N, et al.. (1991). [Anthropometric measurement].. PubMed. 49 Suppl. 58–62.35 indexed citations
11.
Shinagawa, N. (1989). Comparative pharmacokinetics of ceftriaxone, cefmetazole and moxalactam during abdominal surgery.. PubMed. 1(4 Suppl). 524–5.6 indexed citations
12.
Yura, Jiro, N Shinagawa, So Watanabe, et al.. (1988). [Clinical evaluation of cefpodoxime proxetil in the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections. A double blind comparison of cefpodoxime proxetil and cefaclor].. PubMed. 41(10). 1517–37.5 indexed citations
13.
Yura, Jiro, N Shinagawa, Shu Ishikawa, et al.. (1985). [Clinical assessment of sulbactam/cefoperazone in comparison with ceftizoxime in patients with postoperative infections by well controlled method].. PubMed. 38(3). 643–70.1 indexed citations
George, R.H., J Symonds, Joel D. Brown, et al.. (1978). Identification of Clostridium difficile as a cause of pseudomembranous colitis.. BMJ. 1(6114). 695–695.354 indexed citations breakdown →
Shinagawa, N, et al.. (1975). [Definition of midwifery].. PubMed. 29(8). 390–5.1 indexed citations
18.
Shinagawa, N, et al.. (1974). [Fundamental and clinical studies of amikacin (BB-K8) in surgical field (author's transl)]?. PubMed. 27(5). 625–32.1 indexed citations
19.
Shinagawa, N. (1968). [Hemorrhage in obstetrics].. PubMed. 22(12). 53–7.6 indexed citations
20.
Shinagawa, N, et al.. (1968). [Incidence of complications of gastric cancer in pregnancy].. PubMed. 17(12). 1104–11.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.