Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Differentiation of Forms of Extractable Iron and Aluminum in Soils
1971543 citationsJ. A. McKeague, J. E. Brydon et al.Soil Science Society of America Journalprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of N. Miles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. Miles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. Miles more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. Miles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. Miles. The network helps show where N. Miles may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of N. Miles
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of N. Miles.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of N. Miles based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with N. Miles. N. Miles is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Miles, N., et al.. (2018). Potassium dynamics in the soil-plant system and implications for fertiliser recommendations.. 134–138.
3.
Miles, N., et al.. (2017). Effects of surface-applied lime and gypsum on soil properties and yields of sugarcane ratoon crops.. 113–117.1 indexed citations
Miles, N., et al.. (2016). Prediction of the potassium requirement factor for soils of the South African sugar industry.. 262–265.1 indexed citations
6.
Miles, N., et al.. (2016). Soil organic matter under sugarcane: Levels, composition and dynamics. International sugar journal. 119(1418). 144–169.1 indexed citations
7.
Radford, Andrew, et al.. (2016). XVModern Literature. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam). 95(1). 949–1064.
8.
Miles, N., et al.. (2014). Prediction of phosphorus availability and fixation in soils of the southern African sugar industry.. 145–148.2 indexed citations
9.
Antwerpen, R. van, et al.. (2011). Nutrient management options for reducing Eldana saccharina (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) infestation of trashed sugarcane fields: results from a preliminary study.. 298–300.5 indexed citations
10.
Laan, Michael van der & N. Miles. (2010). Nutrition of the South African sugar crop: current status and long-term trends.. International sugar journal. 113(1356). 195–204.7 indexed citations
11.
Miles, N., et al.. (1995). Phosphorus sorption in Natal soils. South African Journal of Plant and Soil. 12(2). 59–64.27 indexed citations
Ivarson, K. C., G. J. Ross, & N. Miles. (1981). Formation of rubidium jarosite during the microbiological oxidation of ferrous iron at room temperature. The Canadian Mineralogist. 19(3). 429–434.9 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.