N. J. Corbet
- Genetics top 2%
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 1%
- Animal Science and Zoology top 2%
- Small Animals top 2%
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Co-authors
- H. M. BurrowGeoffry FordyceR. G. HolroydD. J. JohnstonB. M. BurnsS. A. BarwickM. L. WolcottMichael McGowan
- Topics
- Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (38 papers)Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (27 papers)Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock (13 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesIreland
In The Last Decade
N. J. Corbet
41 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Genetics 856
- Agronomy and Crop Science 563
- Animal Science and Zoology 320
- Small Animals 162
- Reproductive Medicine 135
Countries citing papers authored by N. J. Corbet
This map shows the geographic impact of N. J. Corbet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. J. Corbet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. J. Corbet more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by N. J. Corbet
This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. J. Corbet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. J. Corbet. The network helps show where N. J. Corbet may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of N. J. Corbet
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of N. J. Corbet. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of N. J. Corbet based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with N. J. Corbet. N. J. Corbet is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 22 | |
| 6 | Sperm abnormality traits can contribute to the genetic evaluation for male and female reproduction in tropical beef genotypes | 0 |
| 7 | 26 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 64 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | 29 | |
| 14 | 90 | |
| 15 | 132 | |
| 16 | Appendix 13 - Impact of improved reproduction in northern Australian cow herds | 1 |
| 17 | 112 | |
| 18 | 69 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 8 |
About N. J. Corbet
N. J. Corbet is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Animal Science and Zoology and Genetics, having authored 43 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (38 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (27 papers) and Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (563 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (320 citations) and Genetics (856 citations). N. J. Corbet has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include H. M. Burrow, Geoffry Fordyce, R. G. Holroyd, D. J. Johnston, B. M. Burns, S. A. Barwick, M. L. Wolcott, Michael McGowan, Marina R. S. Fortes and K. C. Prayaga. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Animal Science, Heredity and Theriogenology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.