N. Ernst

1.3k total citations
46 papers, 973 citations indexed

About

N. Ernst is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Materials Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, N. Ernst has authored 46 papers receiving a total of 973 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 28 papers in Biomedical Engineering, 26 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 21 papers in Materials Chemistry. Recurrent topics in N. Ernst's work include Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques (28 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (11 papers) and nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions (11 papers). N. Ernst is often cited by papers focused on Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques (28 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (11 papers) and nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions (11 papers). N. Ernst collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Canada and Russia. N. Ernst's co-authors include Niklas Nilius, Hans‐Joachim Freund, J.H. Block, Werner Schmidt, Yu. Suchorski, H. J. Kreuzer, Hannsjörg Freund, W. Drachsel, H.‐J. Freund and H. J. Kreuzer and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical review. B, Condensed matter and Physical Review B.

In The Last Decade

N. Ernst

45 papers receiving 943 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
N. Ernst Germany 18 534 492 489 198 147 46 973
Jouko Nieminen Finland 19 192 0.4× 465 0.9× 606 1.2× 296 1.5× 155 1.1× 59 1.1k
Vladimir A. Ukraintsev United States 19 206 0.4× 308 0.6× 736 1.5× 475 2.4× 81 0.6× 53 1.0k
D. Coulman Germany 6 293 0.5× 398 0.8× 670 1.4× 191 1.0× 152 1.0× 7 941
Yu. Suchorski Germany 16 294 0.6× 391 0.8× 364 0.7× 126 0.6× 139 0.9× 43 769
N.I. Buchan United States 20 222 0.4× 355 0.7× 741 1.5× 804 4.1× 67 0.5× 38 1.2k
D. J. Bottomley Japan 17 139 0.3× 327 0.7× 579 1.2× 331 1.7× 97 0.7× 50 868
P. H. Lippel United States 7 381 0.7× 293 0.6× 643 1.3× 473 2.4× 52 0.4× 10 932
J. A. Prybyla United States 13 85 0.2× 220 0.4× 606 1.2× 351 1.8× 101 0.7× 29 935
D.W. Bassett United Kingdom 14 446 0.8× 253 0.5× 697 1.4× 97 0.5× 390 2.7× 24 917
E.W. Kuipers Netherlands 20 314 0.6× 627 1.3× 871 1.8× 150 0.8× 230 1.6× 29 1.6k

Countries citing papers authored by N. Ernst

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N. Ernst's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. Ernst with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. Ernst more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N. Ernst

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. Ernst. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. Ernst. The network helps show where N. Ernst may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of N. Ernst

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of N. Ernst. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of N. Ernst based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with N. Ernst. N. Ernst is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ernst, N., et al.. (2021). The share of zombie firms among Austrian nonfinancial companies. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 35–58. 2 indexed citations
2.
Nilius, Niklas, N. Ernst, & H.‐J. Freund. (2002). Tip influence on plasmon excitations in single gold particles in an STM. Physical review. B, Condensed matter. 65(11). 38 indexed citations
3.
Freund, Hans‐Joachim, N. Ernst, Thomas Risse, H. Hamann, & Günther Rupprechter. (2001). Model in Heterogeneous Catalysis: Surface Science Quo Vadis?. physica status solidi (a). 187(1). 257–274. 29 indexed citations
4.
Nilius, Niklas, N. Ernst, & Hans‐Joachim Freund. (2001). On energy transfer processes at cluster–oxide interfaces: silver on titania. Chemical Physics Letters. 349(5-6). 351–357. 34 indexed citations
5.
Nilius, Niklas, N. Ernst, & Hans‐Joachim Freund. (2001). Photon emission from individual supported gold clusters: thin film versus bulk oxide. Surface Science. 478(1-2). L327–L332. 21 indexed citations
6.
Nilius, Niklas, N. Ernst, & Hans‐Joachim Freund. (2000). Photon Emission Spectroscopy of Individual Oxide-Supported Silver Clusters in a Scanning Tunneling Microscope. Physical Review Letters. 84(17). 3994–3997. 163 indexed citations
7.
Ernst, N., et al.. (1999). Field ion microscopy of platinum adatoms deposited on a thin Al2O3 film on NiAl(110). Ultramicroscopy. 79(1-4). 231–238. 15 indexed citations
8.
Suchorski, Yu., et al.. (1997). Interaction of CO and O2 with Pt Studied by Field Ion Appearance Energy Spectroscopy. Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie. 202(1-2). 103–115. 7 indexed citations
9.
Suchorski, Yu., Werner Schmidt, N. Ernst, J.H. Block, & H. J. Kreuzer. (1995). Electrostatic fields above individual atoms. Progress in Surface Science. 48(1-4). 121–134. 64 indexed citations
10.
Unger, Jonas, Yu. A. Vlasov, & N. Ernst. (1995). Probe hole field electron/field ion microscopy and energy spectroscopy of ultrasharp [111]-oriented tungsten tips. Applied Surface Science. 87-88. 45–52. 7 indexed citations
11.
Block, J.H., et al.. (1995). Atomic‐Scale Imaging of Catalytic Surface Reactions. Berichte der Bunsengesellschaft für physikalische Chemie. 99(11). 1363–1369. 6 indexed citations
12.
Schmidt, Werner, N. Ernst, & Yu. Suchorski. (1993). Local electric fields at individual atomic surface sites: field ion appearance energy measurements. Applied Surface Science. 67(1-4). 101–110. 37 indexed citations
13.
Ernst, N.. (1989). Field adsorption of helium and neon on tungsten: An energy-resolved atom-probe study. Surface Science. 219(1-2). 1–32. 31 indexed citations
14.
Forbes, Richard G., et al.. (1984). Derivation of bonding distance and vibration frequency from field evaporation experiments. Surface Science. 141(1). 319–340. 7 indexed citations
15.
Ernst, N. & J.H. Block. (1983). Temperature programmed field desorption of protonated hydrogen from rhodium and tungsten. Surface Science. 126(1-3). 397–404. 16 indexed citations
16.
Ernst, N. & J.H. Block. (1982). Field adsorption of neon on tungsten studied by electron-stimulated field desorption. Surface Science. 117(1-3). 561–570. 7 indexed citations
17.
Ernst, N. & J.H. Block. (1980). Comparison of Debye temperatures for rhodium surface atoms determined during field evaporation and low energy electron diffraction. Surface Science. 91(2-3). L27–L31. 7 indexed citations
18.
Ernst, N., et al.. (1979). Field ion appearance spectroscopy; investigations on ion generating processes at field emitter surfaces. Surface Science. 80. 645–655. 6 indexed citations
19.
Ernst, N., et al.. (1978). The Interaction of Molecules with Field Emitter Surfaces Studied by Field Ion Appearance Spectroscopy. Berichte der Bunsengesellschaft für physikalische Chemie. 82(7). 756–766. 15 indexed citations
20.
Ernst, N., et al.. (1978). Field dependence of critical energy deficits during the field ionization of ammonia. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Ion Physics. 28(1). 27–31. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026