Mu’ath Tanash

525 total citations
8 papers, 307 citations indexed

About

Mu’ath Tanash is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Clinical Psychology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Mu’ath Tanash has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 307 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 3 papers in Clinical Psychology and 2 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Mu’ath Tanash's work include Heart Failure Treatment and Management (3 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (2 papers) and Cardiac Health and Mental Health (2 papers). Mu’ath Tanash is often cited by papers focused on Heart Failure Treatment and Management (3 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (2 papers) and Cardiac Health and Mental Health (2 papers). Mu’ath Tanash collaborates with scholars based in Jordan, United Kingdom and Norway. Mu’ath Tanash's co-authors include Mohammed Al Maqbali, Mohammed Al Sinani, Ayman M. Hamdan‐Mansour, Shaher H. Hamaideh, Hanan Al‐Modallal, Suhair Hussni Al‐Ghabeesh, Ali Alshraifeen, Sami Al‐Rawashdeh, Ala Ashour and Karimeh Alnuaimi and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management and Journal of Clinical Nursing.

In The Last Decade

Mu’ath Tanash

8 papers receiving 301 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mu’ath Tanash Jordan 5 113 109 69 57 46 8 307
Michelle Flynn Canada 7 86 0.8× 112 1.0× 66 1.0× 80 1.4× 33 0.7× 10 450
Chelsea J. Siwik United States 10 159 1.4× 96 0.9× 44 0.6× 68 1.2× 35 0.8× 18 378
Motahare Pilevarzadeh Iran 6 187 1.7× 110 1.0× 68 1.0× 53 0.9× 82 1.8× 27 411
Jingfang Hong China 12 133 1.2× 73 0.7× 54 0.8× 57 1.0× 38 0.8× 36 362
Lakeshia Cousin United States 11 103 0.9× 111 1.0× 33 0.5× 88 1.5× 56 1.2× 29 393
Danielle B. Tometich United States 9 120 1.1× 52 0.5× 58 0.8× 40 0.7× 51 1.1× 22 312
Aradhna Kaushal United Kingdom 8 133 1.2× 167 1.5× 31 0.4× 107 1.9× 30 0.7× 24 483
Ching‐Hui Chien Taiwan 14 171 1.5× 140 1.3× 72 1.0× 111 1.9× 66 1.4× 42 491
Marc Hamel Canada 5 133 1.2× 87 0.8× 73 1.1× 87 1.5× 41 0.9× 11 413
Marije D. J. Wolvers Netherlands 7 187 1.7× 42 0.4× 71 1.0× 49 0.9× 85 1.8× 9 306

Countries citing papers authored by Mu’ath Tanash

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mu’ath Tanash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mu’ath Tanash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mu’ath Tanash more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mu’ath Tanash

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mu’ath Tanash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mu’ath Tanash. The network helps show where Mu’ath Tanash may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mu’ath Tanash

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mu’ath Tanash. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mu’ath Tanash based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mu’ath Tanash. Mu’ath Tanash is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Rababa, Mohammad, et al.. (2024). The Predictors of Perceived Barriers and Facilitators of Applying Sepsis Six Guidelines Among Critical Care Nurses. Cureus. 16(3). e57355–e57355. 1 indexed citations
2.
Abujilban, Sanaa, et al.. (2022). Factors associated with antenatal depression in the Kingdom of Jordan during the COVID-19 pandemic. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2(2). e0000194–e0000194. 3 indexed citations
3.
Ashour, Ala, et al.. (2022). Changes in the Anxiety Levels of Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing. 42(1). 15–21. 1 indexed citations
4.
Fitzsimons, Donna, et al.. (2021). The varied role, scope of practice, and education of cardiovascular nurses in ESC-affiliated countries: an ACNAP survey. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 20(6). 572–579. 4 indexed citations
5.
Hamaideh, Shaher H., Hanan Al‐Modallal, Mu’ath Tanash, & Ayman M. Hamdan‐Mansour. (2021). Depression, anxiety and stress among undergraduate students during COVID‐19 outbreak and "home‐quarantine". Nursing Open. 9(2). 1423–1431. 103 indexed citations
6.
Maqbali, Mohammed Al, et al.. (2020). Prevalence of Fatigue in Patients With Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 61(1). 167–189.e14. 148 indexed citations
7.
Alshraifeen, Ali, Sami Al‐Rawashdeh, Karimeh Alnuaimi, et al.. (2020). Social support predicted quality of life in people receiving haemodialysis treatment: A cross‐sectional survey. Nursing Open. 7(5). 1517–1525. 37 indexed citations
8.
Tanash, Mu’ath, Donna Fitzsimons, Vivien Coates, & Christi Deaton. (2016). An evaluation of the effectiveness of self‐management interventions for people with type 2 diabetes after an acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 26(11-12). 1458–1472. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026