M.T. Fernández-Ponce
- Biochemistry top 1%
- Food Science top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering top 10%
- Biomaterials top 10%
- Polymers and Plastics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Lourdes CasasCasimiro MantellEnrique Martínez de la OssaC. PereyraMiguel RodríguezA. MontesBehnaz Razi ParjikolaeiJuan Luis Sánchez‐Sánchez
- Topics
- Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (14 papers)Mangiferin and Mango Extracts (11 papers)Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics (8 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaChemical Engineering JournalMolecules
In The Last Decade
M.T. Fernández-Ponce
33 papers receiving 931 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
- Biochemistry 343
- Food Science 266
- Biomedical Engineering 256
- Biomaterials 176
- Polymers and Plastics 166
Countries citing papers authored by M.T. Fernández-Ponce
This map shows the geographic impact of M.T. Fernández-Ponce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.T. Fernández-Ponce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.T. Fernández-Ponce more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M.T. Fernández-Ponce
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.T. Fernández-Ponce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.T. Fernández-Ponce. The network helps show where M.T. Fernández-Ponce may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M.T. Fernández-Ponce
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M.T. Fernández-Ponce. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M.T. Fernández-Ponce based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M.T. Fernández-Ponce. M.T. Fernández-Ponce is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 58 | |
| 11 | 56 | |
| 12 | 27 | |
| 13 | 43 | |
| 14 | 66 | |
| 15 | 34 | |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 34 | |
| 18 | 15 | |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | 14 |
About M.T. Fernández-Ponce
M.T. Fernández-Ponce is a scholar working on Biochemistry, Complementary and alternative medicine and Polymers and Plastics, having authored 33 papers that have together received 965 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (14 papers), Mangiferin and Mango Extracts (11 papers) and Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (343 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (145 citations) and Food Science (266 citations). M.T. Fernández-Ponce has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Brazil and China. Frequent co-authors include Lourdes Casas, Casimiro Mantell, Enrique Martínez de la Ossa, C. Pereyra, Miguel Rodríguez, A. Montes, Behnaz Razi Parjikolaei, Juan Luis Sánchez‐Sánchez, Carmen Infante‐Garcia and Mónica García‐Alloza. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Chemical Engineering Journal and Molecules.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.