M.R. O’Brien

1.1k total citations
39 papers, 628 citations indexed

About

M.R. O’Brien is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Aerospace Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, M.R. O’Brien has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 628 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 34 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 15 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 10 papers in Aerospace Engineering. Recurrent topics in M.R. O’Brien's work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (33 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (13 papers) and Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (9 papers). M.R. O’Brien is often cited by papers focused on Magnetic confinement fusion research (33 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (13 papers) and Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (9 papers). M.R. O’Brien collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Russia and United States. M.R. O’Brien's co-authors include M. Cox, A. Saveliev, B. Lloyd, D.F.H. Start, V. F. Shevchenko, C. D. Warrick, D. Taylor, Ф. С. Зайцев, James McKenzie and Y. Baranov and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres.

In The Last Decade

M.R. O’Brien

37 papers receiving 566 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M.R. O’Brien United Kingdom 13 594 298 215 113 109 39 628
T. Hellsten Sweden 9 602 1.0× 313 1.1× 153 0.7× 149 1.3× 70 0.6× 23 631
J.-M. Noterdaeme Germany 12 727 1.2× 406 1.4× 222 1.0× 186 1.6× 87 0.8× 38 775
H. K. Park United States 10 716 1.2× 479 1.6× 122 0.6× 113 1.0× 76 0.7× 15 750
D. Gwinn United States 10 426 0.7× 182 0.6× 124 0.6× 124 1.1× 92 0.8× 32 493
T. Edlington United Kingdom 13 701 1.2× 374 1.3× 215 1.0× 131 1.2× 88 0.8× 33 760
R. Parker United States 12 523 0.9× 293 1.0× 195 0.9× 115 1.0× 60 0.6× 30 564
V. Bhatnagar United Kingdom 14 643 1.1× 263 0.9× 270 1.3× 158 1.4× 70 0.6× 42 685
J. L. Ségui France 19 744 1.3× 388 1.3× 182 0.8× 220 1.9× 70 0.6× 48 767
J. J. Ramos United States 15 604 1.0× 434 1.5× 92 0.4× 137 1.2× 74 0.7× 55 680
B. Joye Switzerland 15 543 0.9× 342 1.1× 133 0.6× 111 1.0× 91 0.8× 36 624

Countries citing papers authored by M.R. O’Brien

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M.R. O’Brien's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.R. O’Brien with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.R. O’Brien more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M.R. O’Brien

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.R. O’Brien. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.R. O’Brien. The network helps show where M.R. O’Brien may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M.R. O’Brien

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M.R. O’Brien. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M.R. O’Brien based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M.R. O’Brien. M.R. O’Brien is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Köhn, A., Thomas Williams, R. G. L. Vann, et al.. (2015). Influence of density fluctuations on the O–X mode conversion and on microwave propagation. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 87. 1003–1003. 2 indexed citations
2.
Shevchenko, V. F., M.R. O’Brien, D. Taylor, & A. Saveliev. (2010). Electron Bernstein wave assisted plasma current start-up in MAST. Nuclear Fusion. 50(2). 22004–22004. 71 indexed citations
3.
Cairns, R. A., et al.. (2007). Flux averaged current drive efficiency of electron Bernstein waves. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. 50(1). 15003–15003. 1 indexed citations
4.
Wilson, H. R., G.M. Voss, R. Akers, et al.. (2004). The Physics Basis jf a Spherical Tokamak Components Test Facility. 1 indexed citations
5.
Зайцев, Ф. С., et al.. (2004). The numerical solution of the self-consistent evolution of plasma equilibria. Computer Physics Communications. 157(2). 107–120. 6 indexed citations
6.
Wilson, H. R., G.M. Voss, R. Akers, et al.. (2004). A Steady State Spherical Tokamak for Components Testing. 8 indexed citations
7.
Shevchenko, V., Y. Baranov, M.R. O’Brien, & A. Saveliev. (2002). Generation of Noninductive Current by Electron-Bernstein Waves on the COMPASS-D Tokamak. Physical Review Letters. 89(26). 265005–265005. 57 indexed citations
8.
Зайцев, Ф. С., R. Akers, & M.R. O’Brien. (2002). Perturbations to deuterium and tritium distributions caused by close collisions with high-energy alpha-particles. Nuclear Fusion. 42(11). 1340–1347. 6 indexed citations
9.
O’Brien, M.R., C. N. Lashmore‐Davies, V. F. Shevchenko, A. K. Ram, & R. A. Cairns. (2000). Electron Bernstein Wave Heating and Current Drive of MAST Plasmas. APS Division of Plasma Physics Meeting Abstracts. 42. 1 indexed citations
10.
O’Brien, M.R., et al.. (2000). Comparison of the NIST and NPL air kerma standards used for X-ray measurements between 10 kV and 80 kV. Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology. 105(5). 701–701. 2 indexed citations
11.
Warrick, C. D., R. J. Buttery, Geoffrey Cunningham, et al.. (2000). Complete Stabilization of Neoclassical Tearing Modes with Lower Hybrid Current Drive on COMPASS-D. Physical Review Letters. 85(3). 574–577. 37 indexed citations
12.
Зайцев, Ф. С., et al.. (1998). Difference Schemes for the Time Evolution of Three-Dimensional Kinetic Equations. Journal of Computational Physics. 147(2). 239–264. 9 indexed citations
13.
Gates, D., B. Lloyd, A.W. Morris, et al.. (1997). Neoclassical islands on COMPASS-D. Nuclear Fusion. 37(11). 1593–1606. 77 indexed citations
14.
Westerhof, E., G. Giruzzi, R. W. Harvey, M.R. O’Brien, & A. G. Peeters. (1996). Comments on ‘‘Analysis of electron cyclotron current drive using neoclassical Fokker–Planck code without bounce-average approximation’’ [Phys. Plasmas 2, 4570 (1995)]. Physics of Plasmas. 3(7). 2827–2828. 1 indexed citations
15.
O’Brien, M.R., et al.. (1995). Three dimensional Fokker-Planck calculation of alpha particle distributions: a TFTR simulation. Nuclear Fusion. 35(12). 1537–1541. 11 indexed citations
16.
Cox, M., N Deliyanakis, J. Hugill, et al.. (1993). Thermal wave studies of electron transport using modulated ECRH. Nuclear Fusion. 33(11). 1657–1676. 11 indexed citations
17.
O’Brien, M.R., M. Cox, & James McKenzie. (1991). Effects of radial transport on current drive in tokamaks. Nuclear Fusion. 31(3). 583–588. 30 indexed citations
18.
Lloyd, B., T. Edlington, M.R. O’Brien, et al.. (1988). ECRH current drive studies in the CLEO tokamak. Nuclear Fusion. 28(6). 1013–1028. 24 indexed citations
19.
Dendy, R. O., M.R. O’Brien, M. Cox, & D.F.H. Start. (1987). Comparison of theory with electron cyclotron current drive experiments on WT-2. Nuclear Fusion. 27(3). 377–382. 5 indexed citations
20.
Dendy, R. O., R. W. Harvey, & M.R. O’Brien. (1987). Predictions of electron cyclotron current drive efficiency for a top-launched extraordinary mode in a Tokamak. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. 29(6). 769–778. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026