Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Ghost Imaging with Thermal Light: Comparing Entanglement and ClassicalCorrelation
2004721 citationsA. Gatti, E. Brambilla et al.Physical Review Lettersprofile →
High-Resolution Ghost Image and Ghost Diffraction Experiments with Thermal Light
2005587 citationsF. Ferri, D. Magatti et al.Physical Review Lettersprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Morten Bache's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Morten Bache with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Morten Bache more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Morten Bache. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Morten Bache. The network helps show where Morten Bache may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Morten Bache
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Morten Bache.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Morten Bache based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Morten Bache. Morten Bache is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Engelsholm, Rasmus D., Binbin Zhou, Patrick Bowen, et al.. (2019). Ultra-low-noise supercontinuum generation with a flat near-zero normal dispersion fiber. Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU).26 indexed citations
Wang, Chuncan & Morten Bache. (2015). Coherent near-mid-IR supercontinuum generation in highly nonlinear multi-cladding liquid-core fiber designed for flat normal dispersion. Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU).1 indexed citations
Bache, Morten, Hairun Guo, Binbin Zhou, & Xianglong Zeng. (2013). The anisotropic Kerr nonlinear refractive index of the beta-barium borate (β-BaB<sub>2</sub>O<sub>4</sub>) nonlinear crystal. Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU).28 indexed citations
10.
Bache, Morten, Hairun Guo, Binbin Zhou, & Xianglong Zeng. (2012). The anisotropic Kerr nonlinear refractive index of \beta-BaB_2O_4. arXiv (Cornell University).1 indexed citations
Zhou, Bingjie, Andy Chong, Frank W. Wise, & Morten Bache. (2011). Few-cycle solitons in short strongly phase-mismatched frequency conversion crystals. arXiv (Cornell University).
Magatti, D. & Morten Bache. (2006). Coherent imaging of a pure phase object with classical incoherent light (12 pages). Physical Review A. 73(5). 53802.1 indexed citations
17.
Ferri, F., D. Magatti, A. Gatti, et al.. (2005). High-Resolution Ghost Image and Ghost Diffraction Experiments with Thermal Light. Physical Review Letters. 94(18). 183602–183602.587 indexed citations breakdown →
Gatti, A., E. Brambilla, Morten Bache, & L. A. Lugiato. (2004). Ghost Imaging with Thermal Light: Comparing Entanglement and ClassicalCorrelation. Physical Review Letters. 93(9). 93602–93602.721 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.