Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Creating Semantic Web contents with Protege-2000
2001595 citationsNatasha Noy, Michael Sintek et al.IEEE Intelligent Systemsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Monica Crubézy
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Monica Crubézy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Monica Crubézy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Monica Crubézy more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Monica Crubézy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Monica Crubézy. The network helps show where Monica Crubézy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Monica Crubézy
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Monica Crubézy.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Monica Crubézy based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Monica Crubézy. Monica Crubézy is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Musen, Mark A., et al.. (2007). Component-Based Support for Building Knowledge-Acquisition Systems.10 indexed citations
2.
Cerri, Stefano A., et al.. (2006). The Grid Shared Desktop for CSCL. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 1493–1499.1 indexed citations
Noy, Natalya F., Monica Crubézy, Ray W. Fergerson, et al.. (2003). Protégé-2000: An Open-Source Ontology-Development and Knowledge-Acquisition Environment: AMIA 2003 Open Source Expo. Europe PMC (PubMed Central). 2003. 953.6 indexed citations
7.
Buckeridge, David L., Mark A. Musen, Paul Switzer, & Monica Crubézy. (2003). An analytic framework fo space-time aberrancy detection in public health surveillance data.. PubMed. 120–4.11 indexed citations
Crubézy, Monica, Zachary Pincus, & Mark A. Musen. (2003). Mediating Knowledge between Application Components.13 indexed citations
12.
Noy, Natalya F., Monica Crubézy, Ray W. Fergerson, et al.. (2003). Protégé-2000: an open-source ontology-development and knowledge-acquisition environment.. PubMed. 953–953.150 indexed citations
13.
O’Connor, Martin J., et al.. (2003). BioSTORM: a system for automated surveillance of diverse data sources.. PubMed. 1071–1071.10 indexed citations
14.
Musen, Mark A., Ray W. Fergerson, Natalya F. Noy, & Monica Crubézy. (2001). Protege-2000: A Plug-in Architecture to Support Knowledge Acquisition, Knowledge Visualization, and the Semantic Web. Europe PMC (PubMed Central). 1079–1079.8 indexed citations
15.
Noy, Natasha, Michael Sintek, Stefan Decker, et al.. (2001). Creating Semantic Web contents with Protege-2000. IEEE Intelligent Systems. 16(2). 60–71.595 indexed citations breakdown →
16.
Fensel, D.A., Monica Crubézy, Frank van Harmelen, & Ian Horrocks. (2000). OIL & UPML: A Unifying Framework for the Knowledge Web..8 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.