Mohit Bhandari

777 total citations
13 papers, 576 citations indexed

About

Mohit Bhandari is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Mohit Bhandari has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 576 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 7 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 5 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Recurrent topics in Mohit Bhandari's work include Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (11 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (5 papers) and Health and Medical Research Impacts (4 papers). Mohit Bhandari is often cited by papers focused on Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (11 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (5 papers) and Health and Medical Research Impacts (4 papers). Mohit Bhandari collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Chile. Mohit Bhandari's co-authors include Paul J. Karanicolas, Forough Farrokhyar, Peter V. Giannoudis, Nicole Simunovic, Sheila Sprague, Gordon Guyatt, Stephen D. Walter, Pablo Alonso‐Coello, Arthur J. Hartz and David Rigau and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Spine and Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.

In The Last Decade

Mohit Bhandari

13 papers receiving 548 citations

Peers

Mohit Bhandari
M. Lelgemann Germany
Mohit Bhandari
Citations per year, relative to Mohit Bhandari Mohit Bhandari (= 1×) peers M. Lelgemann

Countries citing papers authored by Mohit Bhandari

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mohit Bhandari's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mohit Bhandari with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mohit Bhandari more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mohit Bhandari

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mohit Bhandari. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mohit Bhandari. The network helps show where Mohit Bhandari may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mohit Bhandari

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mohit Bhandari. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mohit Bhandari based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mohit Bhandari. Mohit Bhandari is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
1.
Evaniew, Nathan, Alonso Carrasco‐Labra, P.J. Devereaux, et al.. (2016). How to Use a Randomized Clinical Trial Addressing a Surgical Procedure. JAMA Surgery. 151(7). 657–657. 15 indexed citations
2.
Mansouri, Alireza, et al.. (2015). Randomized controlled trials and neuro-oncology: should alternative designs be considered?. Journal of Neuro-Oncology. 124(3). 345–356. 10 indexed citations
3.
Dowrick, Adam S., Paul Tornetta, William T. Obremskey, Douglas R. Dirschl, & Mohit Bhandari. (2012). Practical Research Methods for Orthopaedic Surgeons. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 94(4). 368–374. 7 indexed citations
4.
Bhandari, Mohit, et al.. (2012). Advanced concepts in surgical research. Microsurgery. 33(2). 168–168. 2 indexed citations
5.
Karanicolas, Paul J., Forough Farrokhyar, & Mohit Bhandari. (2010). Practical tips for surgical research: blinding: who, what, when, why, how?. PubMed. 53(5). 345–8. 248 indexed citations
6.
Farrokhyar, Forough, Sohail Bajammal, Kamyar Kahnamoui, & Mohit Bhandari. (2010). Practical tips for surgical research. Ensuring balanced groups in surgical trials.. PubMed. 53(6). 418–23. 5 indexed citations
7.
Singh, Jasvinder A., Stephen J. Murphy, & Mohit Bhandari. (2009). Assessment of the Methodologic Quality of Medical and Surgical Clinical Trials in Patients with Arthroplasty. The Journal of Rheumatology. 36(12). 2642–2654. 11 indexed citations
8.
Simunovic, Nicole, Sheila Sprague, & Mohit Bhandari. (2009). Methodological Issues in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies in Orthopaedic Research. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 91(Supplement_3). 87–94. 70 indexed citations
9.
Karanicolas, Paul J., Mohit Bhandari, Stephen D. Walter, Diane Heels‐Ansdell, & Gordon Guyatt. (2008). Radiographs of hip fractures were digitally altered to mask surgeons to the type of implant without compromising the reliability of quality ratings or making the rating process more difficult. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 62(2). 214–223.e1. 17 indexed citations
10.
Karanicolas, Paul J., Mohit Bhandari, Elie A. Akl, et al.. (2008). Blinding of Outcomes in Trials of Orthopaedic Trauma: An Opportunity to Enhance the Validity of Clinical Trials. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 90(5). 1026–1033. 48 indexed citations
11.
Bhandari, Mohit, et al.. (2007). Planning a clinical research study. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. 41(1). 16–16. 5 indexed citations
12.
Bhandari, Mohit & Peter V. Giannoudis. (2006). Evidence-based medicine: What it is and what it is not. Injury. 37(4). 302–306. 120 indexed citations
13.
Hartz, Arthur J., et al.. (2003). Assessing Observational Studies of Spinal Fusion and Chemonucleolysis. Spine. 28(19). 2268–2275. 18 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026